Teams

Out of Office

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-03-01vs IaleggioLost 01
L#2 DoublesPamela KANSTOROOM / Naomi OBrien vs Amy McDonald / DC Smith1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-14vs Match MakersLost 01
L#1 DoublesKendall Burman / Pamela KANSTOROOM vs JoAnn Ward / Zoie Acadia1-6, 5-7
2023-01-31vs Lakewood 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRegina Bodi / Pamela KANSTOROOM vs Alisa Talisman / Anne Porto1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Kendall Burman
published
3.31
Pamela KANSTOROOM
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Lauren Lennon
published
3.29
Caroline Dennin
published 3.5
3.28
Leanne Bortner
published
3.21
Jennifer Gore
published
3.15
Victoria Quint
published
3.14
Regina Bodi
published
2.82
Corrina McGlone
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Dennin + Kendall Burman213 matchesnot enough data
Regina Bodi + Leanne Bortner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendall Burman
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Pamela KANSTOROOM
102W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Lauren Lennon
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Caroline Dennin
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Leanne Bortner
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Jennifer Gore
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Victoria Quint
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Regina Bodi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
3
Corrina McGlone
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.