Teams

KY/LOU/TAYLOR/BAILEY

2025 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER · 2.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-29vs KY/LOU/MILLIGANWon 20
W#1 SinglesKelsey Norcia vs Drew Andreoli4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesEmily Rives vs Jenny Ballard6-3, 6-0
2025-08-20vs KY/LOU/NIXONSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristina Quigley vs Namuun Gantumur3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAnna Malone vs Jennifer Park6-1, 6-1
2025-08-12vs KY/LOU/OERTHERWon 20
W#2 SinglesHolly Gravely vs Laci Pauley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAllison Taylor vs Yana Feygin6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-04vs KY/LOU/MILLIGANLost 02
L#1 SinglesAnna Malone vs Ann Marie Washbish2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAllison Taylor vs Ursula Melhuish6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-07-31vs KY/LOU/NIXONLost 12
W#1 SinglesLexy Perry vs Robin Scarbrough6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesKristina Quigley vs Tsolmonica Batbold2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKelsey Norcia vs Megan Yussman2-6, 4-6
2025-07-23vs KY/LOU/OERTHERWon 21
L#1 SinglesDeena Neimat vs Sara Rocke5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesEmily Rives vs Laci Pauley7-5, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAllison Taylor vs Nisha Patel6-4, 6-4
2025-07-15vs KY/LOU/MILLIGANSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLexy Perry vs Cammie King2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAllison Taylor vs Ursula Melhuish6-1, 6-0
2025-07-07vs KY/LOU/NIXONWon 10
W#2 SinglesDeena Neimat vs Megan Yussman7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Taylor
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Anna Malone
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.64
Deena Neimat
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.63
Emily Rives
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.53
Kelsey Norcia
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.50
Kristina Quigley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.44
Lexy Perry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.40
Holly Gravely
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Rives + Kelsey Norcia7551% games+0.9% vs expected
Deena Neimat + Lexy Perry404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Taylor
11W–11L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Anna Malone
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Deena Neimat
20W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Emily Rives
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
Kelsey Norcia
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Kristina Quigley
24W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Lexy Perry
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.44
3
Holly Gravely
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.