Teams

Westwood Weekend Watkins

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Diller / Jessica Hupe vs Becky McNeer / Andrea Hill6-1, 6-4
2024-08-25vs RMC - SweeneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Diller / Kristen Moslow vs Victoria Galiffa / Mary Spagnolo6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSara Sloman / Molly McEvoy vs Kathy Flowers / Amber Manry3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-08-10vs Belmont- SherdelWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Diller / Julie Shudtz vs Windy Campbell / Judith McGarrity6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMolly McEvoy / Catherine Stanley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-04vs Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Diller / Erin Gardner vs Michelle Yu / Beth Jones0-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Jessica Hupe
published
3.75
Stephanie Murtaugh
published
3.74
Elizabeth Diller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Kristin Zach
published
3.37
Jessica Parrent
published
3.31
Jamie McLeod
published 3.5
3.29
Heather Harker
published 3.5
3.20
Sarah Thomas
published
3.18
Meghan Dexter
published
3.13
Julie Shudtz
published
3.13
Kristen Moslow
published
3.09
Meredith Berger
published
3.04
Molly McEvoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Sara Sloman
published
2.87
Erin Gardner
published 3
2.70
Margaret Kohler
published
Shirley Watkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Hupe + Elizabeth Diller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Hupe
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.85
Stephanie Murtaugh
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.75
4
Elizabeth Diller
87W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
Kristin Zach
34W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.41
Jessica Parrent
27W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Jamie McLeod
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Heather Harker
5W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
Sarah Thomas
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.20
Meghan Dexter
27W–16L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Julie Shudtz
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
Kristen Moslow
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Meredith Berger
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
Molly McEvoy
43W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Sara Sloman
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Erin Gardner
13W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Catherine Stanley
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.70
Margaret Kohler
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shirley Watkins
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.