Teams

Making a Racquet

2021 SVTA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.81 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-09vs Tennis BabesLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenee Wall / Kate Donadoni vs Angela Goodman / Erica Gormley3-6, 0-6
2021-06-01vs Surfin' the NetSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCheryl Danner / Pamela Deans vs Heather Huling / Teri Fahlgren6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Ann Larson / Maria Svenningsen vs Kristi Nault / Kelly Stanley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-24vs MiddleburgWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Broadbent / Cheryl Danner vs Lauren Woolcott / Ashley la Shelle6-3, 6-3
2021-05-11vs Tennis BabesLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenee Wall / Maria Svenningsen vs Maureen Bornholdt / Mary Gill4-6, 3-6
2021-04-21vs MiddleburgLost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Donadoni / Renee Wall vs Susannah Forde / Jennifer Long2-6, 2-6
2021-04-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKate Donadoni / Kristen Soh vs Maria Sanders / Jacqueline Lawlor4-6, 1-6
2021-04-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesRenee Wall / Kate Donadoni vs Rebecca Watts / Gera Mort6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Erin Green
published 4.5
3.88
Erin Kaplan
published 4
3.63
Mary Ann Larson
published
3.61
Maria Svenningsen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Renee Wall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.51
Josephine Cooper
published
3.39
Holly McMullen
published 3.5
3.38
Kate Donadoni
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.38
Cheryl Danner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Colleen Gustavson
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Wall + Maria Svenningsen21043% games+3.3% vs expected
Kate Donadoni + Renee Wall13750% games+2.6% vs expected
Renee Wall + Erin Kaplan314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erin Green
20W–16L career · no lines in 2021
1%89%10%
4.33
4
Erin Kaplan
40W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
3.88
Mary Ann Larson
10W–16L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Maria Svenningsen
71W–68L career · 3 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Renee Wall
232W–249L career · 10 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
Josephine Cooper
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Holly McMullen
13W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Kate Donadoni
163W–156L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Danner
137W–193L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Colleen Gustavson
1W–13L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.