Teams

Nguyen - Stringing Winners

2025 Loudoun Tri-Level Men · Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-23vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionLost 01
L#3 DoublesSameer Farah / Charlie Haake vs Kazi Hassan / Mark Jensen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSunil Bedakihal / Tom Tran Nguyen vs Warren Chen / Amal Desai3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCharlie Haake / Sameer Farah vs Mark Jensen / Vamsi Krishna Nutheti2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesEdward Xin / Tom Tran Nguyen vs Jesse Cebulash / Ali Abbas6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharlie Haake / Sameer Farah vs Mark Jensen / Vamsi Krishna Nutheti1-6, 2-6
2025-08-23vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionLost 01
L#3 DoublesJorge Grandy / Charlie Haake vs Amal Desai / Prashant Padmashali0-6, 1-6
2025-08-14vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionLost 01
L#3 DoublesJorge Grandy / Charlie Haake vs Prashant Padmashali / Michael Porturica4-6, 0-6
2025-08-03vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionWon 10
W#2 DoublesTom Tran Nguyen / Christopher Ziemnick vs Prashant Padmashali / Alex Saunders6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Edward Xin
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.75
Jason Hecker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Tom Tran Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Sunil Bedakihal
published
2.83
Charlie Haake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Luan Nguyen
published
2.69
Sameer Farah
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Xin + Jason Hecker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edward Xin
95W–50L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Jason Hecker
71W–66L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Tom Tran Nguyen
70W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.42
Sunil Bedakihal
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3
Charlie Haake
28W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Luan Nguyen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Sameer Farah
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.