Teams

OC Cabrillo Tennis Center - Earl - Sun9

2026 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - OC · OC Men 8.0 Super Seniors

14 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 13 1:00 PM
Racquet Club of Irvine
Sep 20 1:00 PM
Racquet Club of Irvine
Sep 27 9:00 AM
Match Point Tennis Academy
2026-08-16vs OC RCI - MichaelWon 30
W#1 DoublesJerry Lesser / Stephen Sampson vs Dean Corley / Dave Roeske6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJim Powers / Mark Madson vs George Balch / Pablo Moreno6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCorey Rhodes / Kevin Smith vs Michael Perdue / Edward Venter6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · OC Men 8.0 Super Seniors
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Cabrillo Tennis Center - Earl - Sun91030017
2OC RCI - Michael0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Greg Wall
published 4
3.71
Corey Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Al Jasinskas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Earl Beauvais
published 3.5
Jerry Lesser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Powers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ken Meyer
published
Mark Madson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Fair
published
Robert Logan
published
Stephen Sampson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Bozarth
published
Timothy Ching
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Schulz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Greg Wall
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Corey Rhodes
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Al Jasinskas
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Earl Beauvais
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jerry Lesser
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jim Powers
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ken Meyer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Madson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Richard Fair
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Logan
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Sampson
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Bozarth
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Ching
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.