Teams

1 Westwood Gilman

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-31vs 10 Bon Air Powers/MossWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristy Seredni / Carlyle Walek vs Martha Rhodes / Donna Lawson6-4, 6-1
2022-05-21vs 8 KRA Thun-DeBolt & LightningWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristy Seredni / Rachel Piacentini vs Krista Quinby / Mandy Miller6-3, 5-3
2022-05-15vs 16 SRA FoleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesRenee Gilman / Kristy Seredni vs Sarah Powers / Kimberlee Pepple6-1, 6-0
2022-04-23vs 12 ACAC TandettLost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee Gilman / Carlyle Walek vs Laleh Amin / Mary Knick6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristy Seredni vs Lauren Bale2-6, 2-6
2022-04-16vs 17 LPC EarleWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristy Seredni / Carlyle Walek vs Joyce Hedish / Christine Holzem6-3, 6-0
2022-04-09vs 6 ACAC Rocio/BlackburnWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristy Seredni / Rachel Piacentini vs Kristin Gray / Ali Silva6-2, 6-1
2022-04-02vs 20 RCC DavisWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarlyle Walek / Kristy Seredni vs Beverly Davis / Pamela Albrecht6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Katy Holder
published
3.52
Kristy Seredni
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.45
Carlyle Walek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Julia Foutz
published
3.20
Sarah Thomas
published
3.18
Christine Holt
published 3.5
3.06
Jenny Sharrar
published
2.97
Renee Gilman
published
2.97
Sara Sloman
published
Brooks Casey
published 3
2.66
Meghann Quinn
published
2.65
2.65
Penny Lowrey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristy Seredni + Carlyle Walek433654% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katy Holder
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Kristy Seredni
150W–89L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Carlyle Walek
129W–89L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Julia Foutz
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Sarah Thomas
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Christine Holt
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Jenny Sharrar
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
Renee Gilman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Sara Sloman
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Brooks Casey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Meghann Quinn
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Ashley Sommardahl
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Penny Lowrey
10W–26L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.