Teams

Dezamacona, Daniel

2022 Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · Open - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.83 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-05-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEduardo Dos Santos / Austin Brooks vs GUILLERMO de VILCHEZ / Hunter Clark2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Open - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Fox/18&OverOpenM22751091
2Jacelone, Marcia226614118
3Bad News Bears - Schere225715107
4Weber, Tim000000
5Gates, Garrett000000
6Dezamacona, Daniel000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Colin McMullin
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 5
4.51
Adam Bales
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.35
Eduardo Dos Santos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.31
Alex Qin
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.27
Cody Pflugradt
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
David Lewandowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Mark Mills
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
Austin Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
Daniel Dezamacona
published
Joseph Hunter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eduardo Dos Santos + Alex Qin044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Colin McMullin
32W–23L career · 9 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.53
5
Adam Bales
53W–40L career · 8 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.51
5
Eduardo Dos Santos
2W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
88%12%<1%
4.35
5
Alex Qin
28W–23L career · 12 lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
4.31
4.5
Cody Pflugradt
45W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
David Lewandowski
24W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Mills
57W–55L career · 9 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.94
Austin Brooks
23W–17L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Daniel Dezamacona
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Hunter
48W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.