Teams

LOCH.Gloer

2026 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-08-13vs TOC.SaykoWon 20
W#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs Ryan Sayko6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesWes Watson vs Visakan Jayakumar7-6, 6-4
2026-08-10vs TOC.SaykoWon 21
W#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs Kelvin Menezes6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesWes Watson vs Daniel Martchek6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesSteven Gloer vs Rayan Jabr7-5, 4-6
2026-08-03vs TOC.PerianWon 21
W#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs James Treires6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesWes Watson vs Praveen Krishnamurthy7-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSteven Gloer vs Sergii Porokh6-2, 6-3
2026-07-27vs MCP.HanauerWon 21
W#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs Spencer Llewellyn6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesWes Watson vs Matthew Hanauer6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJosh Enderline vs William Clark2-6, 4-6
2026-07-20vs TOC.ByrdLost 12
L#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs Herman Gudjonson4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesWes Watson vs Zachariah Anderson2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesSteven Gloer vs Thibault Roumengous6-3, 6-4
2026-07-13vs TOC.XuSplit 11
L#1 SinglesWes Watson vs Kyle Hudson4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs Michael Weslander6-3, 6-3
2026-06-22vs TOC.PerianWon 30
W#1 SinglesSteven Gloer vs Rahul Narang6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesWes Watson vs Santha Perian6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJosh Enderline vs Sergii Porokh6-1, 6-4
2026-06-15vs MCP.HanauerLost 12
L#1 SinglesSteven Gloer vs Peter Kelly4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesWes Watson vs Matthew Hanauer6-3, 7-5
L#3 SinglesThomas Wilbur vs Spencer Llewellyn6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-08vs TOC.ByrdLost 12
W#1 SinglesAneesh Kodali vs Thibault Roumengous6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWes Watson vs Zachariah Anderson2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSteven Gloer vs Nicolas Quevedo1-6, 3-6
2026-06-01vs TOC.XuWon 30
W#1 SinglesSteven Gloer vs Devin Bhatt7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesWes Watson vs Patrick Grant6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesThomas Wilbur vs Raymond Xu7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LOCH.Gloer64181228273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Aneesh Kodali
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 4.5
4.26
Wes Watson
usually #2 Singles 90%, also #1 Singles 10% · published 4.5
4.23
Steven Gloer
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4.5
4.12
Thomas Wilbur
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.77
Josh Enderline
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aneesh Kodali
119W–59L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Wes Watson
154W–128L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Steven Gloer
101W–85L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Thomas Wilbur
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.12
Josh Enderline
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.