Teams

MARIN TC 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-25vs RAFAEL RC 55AM7.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesDerek Boorse / Keith Denkler vs Geoff Greenlee / Madhur Dayal7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-10vs NOVATO TC/PIONEER PK 55AM7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesDerek Boorse / Mark Clem vs Mark Dorian / Steven Lund7-5, 6-4
2025-05-07vs HARBOR PT 55AM7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesDerek Boorse / Mark Clem vs Andrew Hoeberichts / James Wheaton6-2, 6-3
2025-04-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElliott Magnuson / Derek Boorse vs Christopher Clark / Rick Holland2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-29vs RAFAEL RC 55AM7.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Fremier / Derek Boorse vs Steven Denebeim / Craig Thigpen6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Tassos Papadimos
published
3.50
Elliott Magnuson
published
3.39
Jeff Loebbaka
published
3.34
Derek Boorse
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.25
Mark Clem
published
3.19
Babak Jamasbi
published 3.5
3.18
Rob Cochran
published
3.18
Stacy Nimmo
published
3.10
Andrew Fremier
published 3.5
3.09
Keith Denkler
published
2.90
Greg Wilson
published
2.88
George Jackson
published
Tom Schmierer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elliott Magnuson + Jeff Loebbaka3356% gamesnot enough data
Elliott Magnuson + Mark Clem213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tassos Papadimos
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
Elliott Magnuson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Jeff Loebbaka
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
4
Derek Boorse
137W–176L career · 6 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.34
Mark Clem
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Babak Jamasbi
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Rob Cochran
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Stacy Nimmo
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Andrew Fremier
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Keith Denkler
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Greg Wilson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
George Jackson
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
Tom Schmierer
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.