Teams

8 Avalon Spruill

2023 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-18vs 1 MAC BiddleWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Levine / Steven Edlavitch vs Maria Gault / Ralph Novak6-2, 6-2
2023-11-12vs 10 ACAC Rountree/RhodesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartha Luchsinger / Steven Edlavitch vs Bradford Rhodes / Brooke Olson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-28vs 2 SCC GrayLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Jennifer Levine vs Kimberly Means / Tucker Cole2-6, 2-6
2023-10-21vs 4 Westwood DriscollWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Levine / Steven Edlavitch vs Emilie Raymond / Craig Dober6-2, 6-4
2023-10-08vs 11 MTC Cutlip Honey BadgersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Hallett / Steven Edlavitch vs Andrea Bleck-Smith / Luke Vanworkum6-0, 6-1
2023-09-24vs 9 Avalon GhitaLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Jennifer Levine vs Ford Sleeman / TONYA URQUHART3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Steven Edlavitch
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published 3.5
3.15
Sarah Treharne
published
3.10
Sarah Hobgood
published
2.89
Joseph Piwowarski
published
2.60
Andrew Treharne
published 2.5
2.40
Ian Watt
published 3
2.36
Cristin Traylor
published 2.5
2.36
Susan Hallett
published
2.26
Martha Luchsinger
published
2.18
Anne Spruill
published 2.5
2.10
Edward Wagner
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Piwowarski + Cristin Traylor134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Steven Edlavitch
122W–71L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Sarah Treharne
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.15
Sarah Hobgood
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Joseph Piwowarski
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
2.5
Andrew Treharne
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%23%77%
2.60
3
Ian Watt
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.40
2.5
Cristin Traylor
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%85%15%
2.36
Susan Hallett
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
0%87%13%
2.36
Martha Luchsinger
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Anne Spruill
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Edward Wagner
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.