Teams

Valme (Riviera Prep)

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-16vs TennisAddicts (Tamiami Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGregory Joseph / Haim Sasson vs Francisco Romano / Roberto Nieves0-6, 2-6
2024-02-24vs Rodriguez (Ron Ehmann)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGregory Joseph / Haim Sasson vs Jonathan Miller / Fernando Capote3-6, 4-6
2024-02-03vs TennisAddicts (Tamiami Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHaim Sasson / David Elkins vs Francisco Romano / Roberto Nieves2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-01-27Won 10
W#4 DoublesHaim Sasson / Sean Lowery vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Michael Wong
published
3.87
Jorge Casado
published
3.81
David Elkins
published 4
3.76
Gregory Joseph
published
3.63
Sean Lowery
published
3.62
Reginald Baker
published
3.61
Benoist Malherbe
published 4
3.54
Haim Sasson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Jean Pierre
published
3.54
3.49
Weit RIMBAUD
published
3.46
Giampaolo Guarino
published
3.46
Raymond Valme
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Wong + David Elkins9558% games+2.6% vs expected
Haim Sasson + Gregory Joseph41143% games+2.3% vs expected
Giampaolo Guarino + Jean-Pierre Trouillot3343% games−1.1% vs expected
Weit RIMBAUD + Raymond Valme1737% games−2.8% vs expected
Gregory Joseph + Giampaolo Guarino0834% games−9.9% vs expected
Haim Sasson + Sean Lowery5256% gamesnot enough data
Haim Sasson + Giampaolo Guarino033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Wong
20W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
Jorge Casado
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
David Elkins
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Gregory Joseph
36W–38L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
Sean Lowery
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Reginald Baker
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Benoist Malherbe
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Haim Sasson
114W–181L career · 4 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jean Pierre
4W–19L career · no lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.54
Jean-Pierre Trouillot
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Weit RIMBAUD
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
Giampaolo Guarino
3W–22L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
Raymond Valme
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.