Teams

Va Vavoom

2023 Fall Adult 18 & Over Tri-Level · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.71 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-09-24vs Don't Give Me No LinesLost 01
L#3 DoublesJodi Pruett / Barbara Bales vs Dee Long / Laurie McCartney4-8
2022-09-23vs Great Tri!Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJodi Pruett / Catherine Ladd vs Michelle Kelly / Meghan Nielsen5-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Julie Blum
published
Claire Wright
published 4
3.63
Darcy Laszewski
published 4
3.61
Tricia Richards
published
3.38
Catherine Ladd
published 3.5
3.19
Katherine Frisk
published 3.5
3.17
Abbey Pelosi
published 3.5
3.15
Barbara Bales
published 3.5
2.70
Jodi Pruett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kat Kaliski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Bales + Abbey Pelosi3549% games−4.1% vs expected
Julie Blum + Tricia Richards134 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Ladd + Barbara Bales404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
BIBIANA ECHEVERRY RAIGOZA
119W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
Julie Blum
49W–57L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
Claire Wright
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Darcy Laszewski
57W–44L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Tricia Richards
47W–50L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Catherine Ladd
74W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Katherine Frisk
67W–64L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Abbey Pelosi
33W–33L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Bales
28W–28L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jodi Pruett
126W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Kat Kaliski
35W–41L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.