Teams

Mills 3.5

2025 USTA MIXED DOUBLES Adult 18 & Over - SUMMER - HSV · 3.5 MXD 18

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-25vs Patton/Flood 3.5 MixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Worley / Jeanne Efird vs Scott Gillies / Ayesha Patel3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJared Lawrence / Gabriela Revilla vs Travis Cram / Nicole Cole3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJon Mills / Heather Vinas vs Jeremy Patton / Mary Katharine Payne6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-24vs Land 3.5 Mixed 2025Split 11
L#1 DoublesJon Mills / Estephany Ruano vs Julie Hipkins / Jared Kimminau6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Condurso / Barrett Wright vs Emma Picaro / Garo Trtrian6-1, 6-2
2025-07-23vs HU - PressonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJon Mills / Gabriela Revilla vs Emily Smith / Taito Eguchi4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Condurso / Barrett Wright vs Maya Jones / Carter Cox1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Efird / John Worley vs Candice Laroue / Jared Nixon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-16vs HU - PressonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJon Mills / Jeanne Efird vs Candice Laroue / Blake Lancaster6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGabriela Revilla / Philip Parker vs Maya Jones / Carter Cox1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNeil Matson / Michelle Condurso vs Emily Smith / Taito Eguchi2-6, 0-6
2025-07-12vs ONeil_Smith_3.5Mixed2025Won 20
W#1 DoublesNeil Matson / Gabriela Revilla vs Maurice Webb / Lauren Wasley6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJared Lawrence / Estephany Ruano vs David Stisher / Katelyn Smith2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-27vs Patton/Flood 3.5 MixedWon 21
L#1 DoublesJon Mills / Heather Vinas vs Scott Gillies / Ayesha Patel4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEvan Hildner / Jeanne Efird vs Justin Pyle / Victoria Linson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Worley / Michelle Condurso vs Jeremy Patton / Amy Tatsas6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-23vs Brackett 3.5 MXD 18 SummerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJon Mills / Michelle Condurso vs MICHAEL SHAW / Carolina Curry7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPhilip Parker / Gabriela Revilla vs Samuel Knight / Brittany Martin6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Worley / Kaci Shuman vs Hudson Morris / Abby Bridges1-6, 4-6
2025-06-19vs ONeil_Smith_3.5Mixed2025Lost 12
W#1 DoublesNeil Matson / Gabriela Revilla vs Joe Moorman / Madison Swegles7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEvan Hildner / Heather Vinas vs Chris Smith / Katelyn Smith2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Worley / Kaci Shuman vs David Stisher / Mary-Elizabeth Reinhart2-6, 3-6
2025-06-11vs Land 3.5 Mixed 2025Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Condurso / John Worley vs Arthur Wang / Elizabeth Burgreen7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGabriela Revilla / Philip Parker vs Xuejiao Chen / James Bowes1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJared Lawrence / Jeanne Efird vs Brent Land / Caroline Kimminau6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MXD 18 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Neil Matson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Heather Vinas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Jeanne Efird
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.31
Michelle Condurso
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Evan Hildner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Philip Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Gabriela Revilla
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.18
Barrett Wright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
John Worley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Estephany Ruano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Jared Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kaci Shuman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kaitlin Chando
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Condurso + Barrett Wright3257% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Condurso + John Worley134 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Condurso + Neil Matson314 matchesnot enough data
Philip Parker + Gabriela Revilla123 matchesnot enough data
Neil Matson + Gabriela Revilla213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neil Matson
93W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
Heather Vinas
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Jeanne Efird
6W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Michelle Condurso
46W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Evan Hildner
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Philip Parker
25W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Gabriela Revilla
25W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Barrett Wright
18W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
John Worley
21W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Estephany Ruano
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Jared Lawrence
8W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Kaci Shuman
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kaitlin Chando
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.