Teams

Leary - Forest Lakes

2025 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-23vs RyanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEd Leary / Wesley Shelley vs Ian Caskill / Edward Lis6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Baker / Mohan Nadkarni vs William Gordon / Henry Clifford III3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-07-16vs DeSouza - Acac acersWon 20
W#1 SinglesEd Leary vs Pat BRadley7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMohan Nadkarni / Benjamin Baker vs Stephen Smith / William Manning7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-12vs RyanWon 20
W#1 DoublesEd Leary / Mark Critchfield vs David Harmon / Rushman Andrews7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRene Roy / Wesley Shelley vs William Gordon / Henry Clifford III7-6, 6-2
2025-07-02vs DeSouza - Acac acersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMohan Nadkarni vs Pat BRadley3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJohn Oliver / Rene Roy vs William Manning / Stephen Smith6-3, 7-5
2025-06-22vs DeSouza - Acac acersWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Critchfield / Ed Leary vs Henry Hickman / Jordan Barr6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMohan Nadkarni vs Pat BRadley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRene Roy / Matt Jaggard vs Doug Wampler / William Manning6-3, 6-2
2025-06-21vs DeSouza - Acac acersLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Bowerman / Mohan Nadkarni vs Derek Frazier / Carl Kiehn4-6, 1-6
2025-06-18vs RyanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMark Critchfield / Ed Leary vs David Harmon / Ian Caskill6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Baker / Rene Roy vs Justin Pine / Rushman Andrews4-6, 1-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Mark Critchfield
published
3.86
Ed Leary
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.84
Matt Jaggard
published
3.75
Ben Jorgensen
published 4
3.71
Mohan Nadkarni
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.70
John Oliver
published
3.59
Benjamin Baker
published 4
3.53
Rene Roy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.26
Andreas Gahlmann
published 3.5
Wesley Shelley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mohan Nadkarni + Ed Leary8646% gamesnot enough data
Rene Roy + Mohan Nadkarni2445% gamesnot enough data
Rene Roy + Benjamin Baker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Critchfield
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
4
Ed Leary
131W–70L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Matt Jaggard
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Ben Jorgensen
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Mohan Nadkarni
60W–72L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
John Oliver
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Benjamin Baker
16W–17L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Rene Roy
83W–88L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Andreas Gahlmann
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Wesley Shelley
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.