Teams

SRochkind-UNC

2025 Eno River Combo 65 & Over · 65 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-06vs GGlish-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Edmunds / Robert Long vs Charles Fisher / Doug Kopec3-6, 3-6
2025-09-22vs GGlish-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteven Rochkind / Stephen Winters vs Chris Sansone / Charles Fisher0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Hilsabeck / David Molpus vs Alan Furan / Timothy Buckley2-6, 2-6
2025-09-08vs GGlish-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesRick Edmunds / David Molpus vs Charles Fisher / Timothy Buckley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Peadar Noone
published
3.06
Stephen Winters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Rick Edmunds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Philip Levy
published
2.88
Robert Long
published
2.75
David Molpus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Peter Flack
published
2.64
David Hilsabeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
MICHAEL LANCASTER
published
2.55
Steven Rochkind
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Jaskot
published
Rolland Olin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Long + Rick Edmunds3545% games−0.9% vs expected
Robert Long + Steven Rochkind033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peadar Noone
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Stephen Winters
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Rick Edmunds
76W–92L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
Philip Levy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Robert Long
13W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
David Molpus
3W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Peter Flack
11W–21L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
3
David Hilsabeck
0W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
MICHAEL LANCASTER
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Steven Rochkind
5W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Richard Jaskot
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rolland Olin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.