Teams

Fred Tri 3.0-4.0

2022 Frederick Tri Level 18 & Over · Frederick Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-19vs Frederick Tri Newell 3.0-4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChad King / Joe MacHovec vs Jason Bryant / MATTHEW HEINRICHS2-6, 5-7
2022-11-16vs Frederick Tri Newell 3.0-4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJoe MacHovec / Chad King vs Jason Bryant / Roderick Valencia2-6, 0-6
2022-11-14vs Frederick Tri Newell 3.0-4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Grimaldi / Riley Barry vs MATTHEW HEINRICHS / Eric Parker6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-11-12vs Frederick Tri Newell 3.0-4.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesJoe MacHovec / Terry Moore vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Grimaldi / Chad King vs Eric Parker / Roderick Valencia3-6, 2-6
2022-11-07vs Frederick Tri Newell 3.0-4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Grimaldi / Chad King vs Eric Parker / Dan Zoberbier5-7, 3-6
2022-11-05vs Frederick Tri Newell 3.0-4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCliff Quicksell / Joe MacHovec vs Jason Bryant / Roderick Valencia3-6, 4-6
2022-10-30vs Frederick Tri Newell 3.0-4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Labozzetta / Joe MacHovec vs MATTHEW HEINRICHS / Dan Zoberbier3-6, 1-6
2022-10-15vs Frederick Tri Newell 3.0-4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJoe MacHovec / Cliff Quicksell vs Jason Bryant / Dan Zoberbier2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Justin Cady
published
3.64
Bill Devine
published 4
3.59
Joseph Bahorich
published 4
3.44
Gerald McClellan
published 3.5
3.03
Joseph Jacangelo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
David Grimaldi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Chad King
published 3
2.27
Joe MacHovec
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Tim Sawyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Jacangelo + Majed Hamawy314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Cady
27W–19L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Bill Devine
3W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Joseph Bahorich
195W–158L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Gerald McClellan
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3
Joseph Jacangelo
155W–162L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
David Grimaldi
24W–24L career · type M · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Chad King
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.61
2.5
Joe MacHovec
24W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
Tim Sawyer
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.