Teams

Hendrich

2025 USTA 60 & OVER TEAM INVITATIONAL · 3.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-17vs KY/LOU/MEADOWSLost 03
L#1 DoublesRonette Brumfield / Chris Hendrich vs Carolyn Chou / Joan Coleman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Mattingly / Julie Dailey vs Michele Coan / Vanya Smith7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Mattingly / Deborah Roberts vs Diane Thomas / Linda Crowe2-6, 2-6
2025-05-17vs Lex/YATESWon 30
W#1 DoublesGail Stein / Ronette Brumfield vs Nancy Bailey / Shera Moulton7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Mattingly / Julie Dailey vs Mary Diggins / Susan Miller6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChris Hendrich / Cathy Wheeler vs Miemie Dorfling / Sandra Watts-Ryan6-3, 6-3
2025-05-16vs Paducah/SchiffLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Hendrich / Ronette Brumfield vs Bonnie Miller / Theresa Lundberg2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hilles / Julie Dailey vs Karen Falder / Yvette Brehm6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Mattingly / Gail Stein vs Judy Cates / Leslie Bassi6-4, 6-3
2025-05-16vs KY/PAD/KINEMANWon 21
W#1 DoublesRonette Brumfield / Chris Hendrich vs Mashelle Kiggins / Karen Kineman7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGail Stein / Donna Mattingly vs Donna Almand / Dianna Mazzoni7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Roberts / Stephanie Hilles vs Paula Edwards / Betty Higdon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Ronette Brumfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Kathleen Mattingly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Gail Stein
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Chris Hendrich
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Donna Mattingly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Julie Dailey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Cathy Wheeler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Stephanie Hilles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Wheeler + Chris Hendrich4251% gamesnot enough data
Chris Hendrich + Ronette Brumfield134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ronette Brumfield
13W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Kathleen Mattingly
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Gail Stein
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Chris Hendrich
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Donna Mattingly
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Julie Dailey
17W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
3
Cathy Wheeler
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
Stephanie Hilles
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.