Teams

4-JByrd/SLlewellyn-Eno

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-05vs 1-JMontague-CCC 7.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesJoshua Collins / Frederick Holding vs Jeff Reedy / Arash Chehrazi6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSpencer Llewellyn / Reece Desonglo vs Conor Kregecz / Will Johnson6-2, 6-3
2023-09-21vs 2-MYoung-Eno-7.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStephen Holmes / Spencer Llewellyn vs Zack Czajkowski / Christopher Green2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-31vs 7-DVyas-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Collins / Edward Bernier vs Richard Griffin / Tevin Wilson6-1, 6-1
2023-08-24vs 6-NPuri-EnoLost 03
L#1 DoublesYoungjun Lee / Spencer Llewellyn vs Mohit Bhatnagar / Asim Javaid4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Gaither / Frederick Holding vs Vijay Sharma / AJAY VARMA GANAPATHIRAJU4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEdward Bernier / Rawle Sue-Ho vs Nitni Agrawal / Sushrut Bhowmik - *6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-01vs 5-RGoff-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEdward Bernier / Thomas Gaither vs William Clark / Maxwell Gregson1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSpencer Llewellyn / Youngjun Lee vs Ryan Berliner / Visakan Jayakumar0-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Rawle Sue-Ho
published
4.27
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Youngjun Lee
published
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.72
Alex Piasecki
published 4
3.65
Reece Desonglo
published
3.61
Matthew Curry
published
3.36
Frederick Holding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Edward Bernier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Spencer Llewellyn + Rawle Sue-Ho303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rawle Sue-Ho
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
230W–157L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
Youngjun Lee
31W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
4.06
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 10 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Alex Piasecki
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Reece Desonglo
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.65
Matthew Curry
29W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Frederick Holding
120W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Edward Bernier
164W–76L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.