Teams

Gordon/3.5/18+/Ruston/RPAR

2026 Ruston Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.5 Ruston (18&O) Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-26vs Wick/3.5/18+/Ruston/RPARWon 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Johnson / Donna Wilburn vs Krystal Corbett / Candace Gilmore6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesApril Easley / Jennifer Sanderson vs Taylor Weeks / Emilie Tomlin7-5, 6-4
2026-04-12vs Wick/3.5/18+/Ruston/RPARWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristi Williams / Cindy Gordon vs Krystal Corbett / DeEtte Wick6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTina Otwell / April Easley vs Taylor Weeks / Candace Gilmore3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Wilburn / Barbara Johnson vs Kylie Berry / Tiphanie Maxwell1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-29vs Wick/3.5/18+/Ruston/RPARWon 21
L#1 DoublesApril Easley / Ashton Thomas vs DeEtte Wick / Taylor Weeks5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristi Williams / Cindy Gordon vs Emilie Tomlin / Mary Moore6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sanderson / Anh Le vs Kylie Berry / Candace Gilmore6-1, 6-1
2026-03-22vs Wick/3.5/18+/Ruston/RPARWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristi Williams / Donna Wilburn vs Taylor Weeks / Emilie Tomlin6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesApril Easley / Jennifer Sanderson vs Krystal Corbett / DeEtte Wick6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTina Otwell / Ashton Thomas vs Tiphanie Maxwell / Kylie Berry2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Ruston (18&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gordon/3.5/18+/Ruston/RPAR4015511105
2Wick/3.5/18+/Ruston/RPAR0451532213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Cindy Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Donna Wilburn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.04
April Easley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Tina Otwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Jennifer Sanderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jessica Johnson
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Gordon
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Donna Wilburn
14W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
April Easley
6W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Tina Otwell
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Jennifer Sanderson
35W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Jessica Johnson
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.