Teams

GAC-Sets Machine

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-02vs PC-Happy HourSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Anslinger / Danny Anslinger vs Emerson Clark / Lindy Bentley6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristy Field / Wes Haynes vs James Kirkham / Jadee Kirkham5-7, 3-6
2021-05-01vs CBRC-SamuelSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPeter Joseph / Marissa Guzman vs Angela Cragin / Sheng-Lun Tai7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDanny Anslinger / Michelle Anslinger vs Diana Titechko / Trevor Morrison1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-01vs YTC-McLeanWon 30
W#1 DoublesWes Haynes / Cindy Pielli vs Cynthia Kimel / Raymond Rust Jr6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarissa Guzman / Peter Joseph vs Liberty McLean / Aaron McLean7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristy Field / Shaun Anderson vs Silvia Labes / Chris Cantrell7-6, 6-3
2021-04-30vs YTC-FranklinWon 21
L#1 DoublesPeter Joseph / Marissa Guzman vs Cole Rojan / Anne Rojan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDanny Anslinger / Michelle Anslinger vs Ross Austin / Kristen Kegley6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShaun Anderson / Christy Field vs Scott Ladd / Marcie Ehlis7-5, 6-3
2019-10-12vs YTC-FranklinWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarissa Guzman / Peter Joseph vs Cole Rojan / Anne Rojan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Pielli / Hugo Chavarria vs Ross Austin / Dani Austin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Danny Anslinger
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Peter Joseph
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Christy Field
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Adam Rahmlow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Cindy Pielli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marissa Guzman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Anslinger
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Shaun Anderson
published
Wes Haynes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danny Anslinger + Michelle Anslinger11754% games+5.8% vs expected
Peter Joseph + Marissa Guzman5453% gamesnot enough data
Shaun Anderson + Cindy Pielli213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danny Anslinger
46W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Peter Joseph
19W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Christy Field
16W–34L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Adam Rahmlow
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Cindy Pielli
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marissa Guzman
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Anslinger
26W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shaun Anderson
18W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wes Haynes
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.