Teams

Jones 6.5 Mixed Combo

2021 Frederick County Combo Mixed · Combo 18 & Over Mixed 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.56 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-04-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesBradley Jacques / STACEY WOLFE vs Gregory Mason / Charlotte Schlee6-1, 6-1
2021-04-10vs Hawk 6.5 MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesJagannath Surampudi / STACEY WOLFE vs David Price / Kimberly Price6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-06vs Hawk 6.5 MixedSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJagannath Surampudi / Emily Barry vs Scott Alban / Sabrina Alban5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBradley Jacques / Donna Jones vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-03vs Hawk 6.5 MixedWon 10
W#1 DoublesBradley Jacques / Donna Jones vs Joseph Martin / Rebecca DeGioia6-2, 7-6
2021-03-23vs Hawk 6.5 MixedWon 20
W#1 DoublesBradley Jacques / Donna Jones vs Gregory Mason / Rebecca DeGioia6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesIvan Kozliak / STACEY WOLFE vs Bill Hartman / Jodi Hathaway6-3, 6-2
2021-03-21vs Hawk 6.5 MixedWon 10
W#3 DoublesIvan Kozliak / STACEY WOLFE vs David Price / Jennifer Willie6-3, 6-1
2021-03-20vs Hawk 6.5 MixedWon 10
W#1 DoublesSTACEY WOLFE / Ivan Kozliak vs Jodi Hathaway / Joseph Martin6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Michele Brammer
published
3.83
Daniel Mansfield
published 4
3.61
Ivan Kozliak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.59
Bradley Jacques
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published 4
3.46
Erin Newsome Moltz
published 3.5
3.33
Jagannath Surampudi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Armando Zamora
published 3.5
3.19
Leslie Mansfield
published
3.11
Giselle Medina
published 3.5
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.74
Emily Barry
published 3
Michael Simonds
published
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Mansfield + Daniel Mansfield3352% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Brammer
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Daniel Mansfield
33W–20L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Ivan Kozliak
300W–288L career · 8 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Bradley Jacques
192W–208L career · 12 lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Erin Newsome Moltz
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Jagannath Surampudi
296W–330L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Armando Zamora
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Leslie Mansfield
36W–23L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Giselle Medina
28W–27L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Emily Barry
15W–19L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
Michael Simonds
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.