Teams

Boggs

Combo · 7.5 Ladies

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-01vs DaneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCamille Cruz / Adrienne Richards vs Maile Gentry / Kim Cone4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bustamante / Kaley Cantu vs Sarah Wakefield / Anna Fargason6-3, 6-4
2026-08-25vs Chisholm/EvansSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCamille Cruz / Cody Boggs vs Raegan Boren / Shannon Miller6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLydia Williams / Kaley Cantu vs Amanda Chisholm / Laurie Oltmans0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-18vs WhiteLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Bustamante / Camille Cruz vs Katie DeGraaf / Amanda White6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaley Cantu / Cody Boggs vs Chelsea Schulz / Ellie Carson3-6, 0-6
2026-08-11vs DaneLost 01
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Richards / Jennifer Bustamante vs Ali Hamilton / Kaily Ghilea6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-04vs Chisholm/EvansLost 02
L#1 DoublesCamille Cruz / Kelly Welch vs Jennifer Moore / Shaunna Jensen3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaley Cantu / Cori Hanson vs Tiffany Fioroni / Kacy Bednarz3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1White3072972
2Chisholm/Evans21541087
3Dane12451283
4Boggs03271486

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Camille Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Adrienne Richards
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.45
Jennifer Bustamante
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Kaley Cantu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Cori Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Cody Boggs
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Kelly Welch
published
Lydia Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Cruz + Cody Boggs5166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camille Cruz
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Adrienne Richards
15W–10L career · type S · 10 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
Jennifer Bustamante
18W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Kaley Cantu
9W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Cori Hanson
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Cody Boggs
40W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Kelly Welch
9W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lydia Williams
15W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.