Teams

Bonsignore - RS Clay

2021 Escambia Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-20vs ESCAMBIA - Wallace - RSLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Mary Bryan vs Jacqueline Wallace / Kelly Dempsey1-6, 2-6
2021-03-12vs ESCAMBIA - Wallace - RSLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Emily Hillman vs Terry Armstrong / Kristyn Miller2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLiz Payne / Deborah Cupp vs Karen Penn / Vicki Carson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Powell / Mary Bryan vs Gloria Langan / Ingrid Corbett2-6, 4-6
2021-03-02vs ESCAMBIA - Wallace - RSLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Mary Benoit vs Ingrid Corbett / Kelly Dempsey7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Powell / Mary Bryan vs Selma Dudley Horne / Karen Penn2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-02-13vs ESCAMBIA - Wallace - RSWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Emily Hillman vs Gloria Langan / Barbara French6-2, 6-2
2021-01-30vs ESCAMBIA - Wallace - RSLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Bryan / Suzanne Manziek vs Becky Siegel / Barbara French6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Emily Hillman vs Terry Armstrong / Vicki Carson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLiz Payne / Deborah Cupp vs Selma Dudley Horne / Ingrid Corbett6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2021-01-23vs ESCAMBIA - Wallace - RSLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Mary Benoit vs Jacqueline Wallace / Selma Dudley Horne6-7, 5-7
2021-01-16vs ESCAMBIA - Wallace - RSLost 02
L#1 DoublesLiz Payne / Betty Wolff vs Terry Armstrong / Vicki Carson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Powell / Mary Bryan vs Jacqueline Wallace / Kelly Dempsey1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Emily Hillman
published 4
3.26
Celine Hansford
published 3.5
3.23
Mary Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Susan Bonsignore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Liz Payne
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Nena Haigler
published
Sharon Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Bonsignore + Mary Bryan0538% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Hillman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Celine Hansford
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Mary Bryan
74W–123L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Susan Bonsignore
98W–94L career · 6 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
Nena Haigler
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Powell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.