Teams

Hills/J. Orsini/18&Over8.5M

2023 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.29 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-02vs River Hills Rally - F. WuLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Chang / Jaime Villegas vs Manuel Alvarez / Joseph Harrington4-6, 3-6
2023-08-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesNils Corrales / Jaime Villegas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesElvin Vargas / Rafael Angel Rodriguez Gonzalez vs Gabriel Mead / Michael Baldemor6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElvin Vargas / Rafael Angel Rodriguez Gonzalez vs Michael Laccabue / Matt Laccabue3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesNils Corrales / Jaime Villegas vs Steven Michaelis / Sebastian Brust6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-07-08vs TYCC - J. FeeneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesElvin Vargas / Alexandre BOURDIAUX vs James Lass / Gordon Lucas6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-01vs River Hills Rally - F. WuWon 10
W#2 DoublesRafael Angel Rodriguez Gonzalez / Jaime Villegas vs Ignacio Molina / Fred Wu6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElvin Vargas / Rafael Angel Rodriguez Gonzalez vs Lance Hill / Brian Stone2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
4.51
Patrick Chang
published
4.32
Chris New
published 4.5
4.30
Bruno Alves
published 4.5
4.22
Nils Corrales
published
3.96
Jonathan F Collazo
published
3.84
Gunnar Nelson
published 4
3.79
Carlos Layrisse
published 4
3.72
Richard Helme
published
3.71
Jaime Villegas
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.65
Elvin Vargas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Yarek Orsini
published
Robert Miller
published
Shane Broussard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elvin Vargas + Jaime Villegas3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alexandre BOURDIAUX
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.73
Patrick Chang
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.51
4.5
Chris New
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Bruno Alves
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.30
Nils Corrales
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
Rafael Angel Rodriguez Gonzalez
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.01
Jonathan F Collazo
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Gunnar Nelson
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Carlos Layrisse
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
Richard Helme
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.72
4
Jaime Villegas
129W–65L career · 7 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Elvin Vargas
127W–111L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
Yarek Orsini
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.58
Robert Miller
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shane Broussard
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.