Teams

LLW - Bako - Team Broussard

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 4.0 - Bake

18 players · average NTRP 4.06 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-22vs Bako - Team Holliday/GarriquezWon 20
W#1 DoublesSally Goossen / Beth van Voorhis vs Marites Idica / Erin Black6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Briana Starr vs Clare Gilliam / Victoria Seaman7-6, 6-2
2025-06-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Briana Starr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-08vs Bako - Team Holliday/GarriquezLost 02
L#1 SinglesRochelle Torgusen vs Ashley South1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDenise Duquette vs Marites Idica1-6, 2-6
2025-06-01vs Bako - Team Holliday/GarriquezWon 20
W#2 DoublesBriana Starr / Natalie Chene vs Becca Ferguson / Kori Harrison6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRochelle Torgusen vs Linette Holliday7-5, 6-2
2025-05-18vs Bako - Team Holliday/GarriquezWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Amason / Beth van Voorhis vs Maureen Andrew / Amy Meger6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDenise Duquette vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-04vs Bako - Team Holliday/GarriquezWon 20
W#1 DoublesSally Goossen / Beth van Voorhis vs SENEA GARRIQUEZ / Lisa Limpias6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBriana Starr / Natalie Chene vs Edyta Grant / Opal Devine6-0, 7-5
2025-04-27vs Bako - Team Holliday/GarriquezWon 10
W#3 DoublesBriana Starr / Natalie Chene vs Linette Holliday / Ashley South6-1, 6-1
2025-04-13vs Bako - Team Holliday/GarriquezWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth van Voorhis / Laura Amason vs SENEA GARRIQUEZ / Lisa Limpias7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Liza Chen
published
3.90
Briana Starr
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.84
Cindy Broussard
published 4.5
3.83
Heather Tkac
published 4
3.81
Natalie Chene
published
3.80
Nikki Hiebert
published
3.79
Rochelle Torgusen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Beth van Voorhis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Lauren Eittreim
published 4
3.66
Sara Paul
published
3.64
Sally Goossen
published
3.64
Sheridan Hadaway
published
3.50
Laura Amason
published
3.49
Denise Duquette
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.48
Brooke Drake
published 4
3.42
Susan Frakes
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.31
Jessie Blackwell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Andrea Ames
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Briana Starr + Lauren Eittreim33365% games+9.3% vs expected
Heather Tkac + Sally Goossen4255% games−1.3% vs expected
Beth van Voorhis + Sally Goossen123 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Broussard + Natalie Chene213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liza Chen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Briana Starr
70W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
4.5
Cindy Broussard
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
Heather Tkac
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Natalie Chene
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
Nikki Hiebert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Rochelle Torgusen
48W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Beth van Voorhis
39W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Lauren Eittreim
57W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.66
Sara Paul
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.66
Sally Goossen
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.64
Sheridan Hadaway
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Laura Amason
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Denise Duquette
37W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Brooke Drake
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Susan Frakes
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jessie Blackwell
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
4
Andrea Ames
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.