Teams

LTFCS SKINNER

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-17vs CSCC TAFOLLALost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Tiffany Freel vs Patrice Tafolla / Sutton Spanton4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-10vs PBCP BARNHILLWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Lisa Field vs Brigitte Juarez / Rochelle Wristen6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJudi Ashmen / Renee Keller vs Cecily Donovan / KOUKKAI BARNHILL2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Skinner / Kim Weston vs Jean Ray / Kristina Proctor6-4, 7-5
2023-07-03vs GOG KREPSWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmy CLARK / Judi Ashmen vs Cara Thoman / Sarah Shaeffer6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Skinner / Kim Weston vs Erin Phillips / Yvonne Conrad6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-26vs CSRC POULINWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Nancy Thompson vs Patricia Poulin / Noel Kelly7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Weston / Amy CLARK vs Kathleen Brannan / Jean Miller6-2, 6-1
2023-06-19vs CCOC HUNTLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Stacey Self vs Shannon Leifer / Marishah Erickson2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNancy Thompson / Judi Ashmen vs Kelsey Hunt / Joy Farmer0-6, 2-6
2023-06-12vs CSCC TAFOLLASplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Stacey Self vs Carre Bistline / Sutton Spanton3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTiffany Freel / Judi Ashmen vs Paula Hanson / Peggy Kimsey6-2, 6-0
2023-06-05vs PBCP BARNHILLWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Stacey Self vs Ana Bhagat / Cecily Donovan6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Colleen Monahan
published 3.5
3.12
Renee Keller
published
3.05
Kim Weston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Judi Ashmen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Susan Shaink
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Stacey Self
published
2.78
Marilyn McGee
published
2.71
Amy CLARK
published 3
2.67
Tiffany Freel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judi Ashmen + Susan Shaink3261% games+1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Colleen Monahan
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Renee Keller
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Kim Weston
78W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Judi Ashmen
62W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Susan Shaink
114W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Stacey Self
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Marilyn McGee
7W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Amy CLARK
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Tiffany Freel
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.