Teams

WI Adult 18&O 4.5 W MALT Fuchs

2022 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-25vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5 W MALT KolpekWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamantha Fuchs / Shelby Chorney vs Gina Kolpek / Renee Nelson6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJewel Lindwall vs Brenda Harper6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMeredith Short / Amy Malik vs Patricia VanVoorhees / Sydney Verbauwhede7-6, 7-5
2022-07-18vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5 W MALT NuenthelWon 31
W#1 DoublesHailey Munz / Bailey Chorney vs Lauren Fahl / Kelly Nuenthel6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJessie O'Brien vs Morgan Wilson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Conley / Shelby Chorney vs Madeline Slicker / Sara Sowinski6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSamantha Fuchs / Amy Malik vs Kayla O'Neill / Nicole Newcomer6-0, 6-4
2022-07-04vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5 W MALT KolpekWon 31
W#1 DoublesCecile Fuchs / Samantha Fuchs vs Dawn Koopman / Jessie Bathe6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHailey Munz vs Carol Polipnick6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShelby Chorney / Bailey Chorney vs Rory Boll / Foluke Otitoju6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJessie O'Brien vs Renee Nelson1-6, 1-6
2022-06-27vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5 W MALT NuenthelWon 41
L#1 DoublesShelby Chorney / Bailey Chorney vs Morgan Counts / Kelly Nuenthel5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMeredith Conley vs Elizabeth Reuter6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCecile Fuchs / Samantha Fuchs vs Kayla O'Neill / Lauren Fahl6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKai Heineman vs Madeline Slicker6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Malik / Meredith Short vs Nicole Newcomer / Natalie Blonien6-0, 7-6
2022-06-13vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5 W MALT KolpekWon 50
W#1 DoublesBailey Chorney / Hailey Munz vs Sydney Verbauwhede / Dawn Koopman6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSamantha Fuchs vs Allyson Verbauwhede6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCecile Fuchs / Amy Malik vs Gina Kolpek / Jessie Bathe6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKai Heineman vs Brenda Harper6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMeredith Short / Jewel Lindwall vs Foluke Otitoju / Andrea Kreft6-1, 6-4
2022-06-06vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5 W MALT NuenthelWon 41
W#1 DoublesCecile Fuchs / Samantha Fuchs vs Kelly Nuenthel / Morgan Counts6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMeredith Conley vs Madeline Slicker6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBailey Chorney / Hailey Munz vs Lauren Fahl / Natalie Blonien6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJewel Lindwall vs Morgan Wilson5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Malik / Meredith Short vs Nicole Newcomer / Kayla O'Neill7-5, 7-6
2022-05-23vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5 W MALT KolpekWon 41
W#1 DoublesSamantha Fuchs / Hailey Munz vs Sydney Verbauwhede / Allyson Verbauwhede6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJessie O'Brien vs Carol Polipnick3-6, 5-3
W#2 DoublesShelby Chorney / Meredith Short vs Gina Kolpek / Patricia VanVoorhees6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesMeredith Conley vs Jessie Bathe6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJewel Lindwall / Kai Heineman vs Foluke Otitoju / Joan Mohr6-2, 6-1
2022-05-16vs WI Adult 18&O 4.5 W MALT NuenthelWon 41
W#1 DoublesCecile Fuchs / Hailey Munz vs Kelly Nuenthel / Elizabeth Reuter6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJewel Lindwall vs Morgan Counts0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBailey Chorney / Shelby Chorney vs Sara Sowinski / Morgan Wilson6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKai Heineman vs Madeline Slicker6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMeredith Conley / Amy Malik vs Natalie Blonien / Kayla O'Neill6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Hailey Munz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.53
Cecile Fuchs
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.87
Amy Malik
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Bailey Chorney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jessie O'Brien
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jewel Lindwall
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Kai Heineman
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Meredith Conley
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Samantha Fuchs
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Shelby Chorney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hailey Munz + Cecile Fuchs10077% games+14.2% vs expected
Bailey Chorney + Hailey Munz303 matchesnot enough data
Bailey Chorney + Shelby Chorney213 matchesnot enough data
Cecile Fuchs + Samantha Fuchs303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hailey Munz
20W–0L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
4.54
4.5
Cecile Fuchs
51W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.53
4
Amy Malik
26W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
Bailey Chorney
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jessie O'Brien
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jewel Lindwall
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kai Heineman
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Meredith Conley
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Samantha Fuchs
7W–0L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelby Chorney
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.