Teams

BBTC - Juraszek/Ward

2025 Mixed 18 & Over-GC · 4.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-21vs BBTC - MendenhallWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam van Kirk / Amber Juraszek vs Lynette Cooper / Damien Colbet6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEvan Chubb / Allison Ward vs Angie Simmons / Dana Ladnier6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarly Nichols Coy / Renaldo Jordan vs Julie West / Pierce Weatherly6-4, 6-3
2025-07-15vs BBTC - DescherWon 21
W#1 DoublesEvan Chubb / Carly Nichols Coy vs Ryan Canon / Amanda Letonoff6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesWilliam van Kirk / Hollie Miller vs Julie Bradley / Daryle Bradley6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmber Juraszek / Benjamin Vance vs Michael Chowske / Shelly Williams3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-07vs BBTC - MendenhallWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam van Kirk / Carly Nichols Coy vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall / Dana Ladnier6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Ward / Lisa Mabry Smith vs Pierce Weatherly / Angie Simmons6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHollie Miller / Renaldo Jordan vs Lynette Cooper / Damien Colbet4-6, 3-6
2025-07-02vs Byrd/OSTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEvan Chubb / Carly Nichols Coy vs Tony Chapman / Heidi St. Amant6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGage Switzer / Chase Bradford vs Lynsie Battles / Lennon Rea4-6, 4-6
2025-06-25vs Byrd/OSTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesGage Switzer / Chase Bradford vs Lennon Rea / Ashlegh Wine6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRenaldo Jordan / Hollie Miller vs Lynsie Battles / Wade Hardy5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Ward / Carly Nichols Coy vs Charles Wilson / Laura Marcel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-04vs BBTC - DescherWon 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam van Kirk / Allison Ward vs Julie Bradley / Johnny Hisaw6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Vance / Lisa Mabry Smith vs Ryan Canon / Missy Descher6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarly Nichols Coy / Gage Switzer vs Jeff Descher / Shelly Williams6-0, 6-1
2025-05-22vs BBTC - DescherWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam van Kirk / Lisa Mabry Smith vs Amanda Letonoff / Ryan Canon6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAllison Ward / Renaldo Jordan vs Jeff Descher / Jackie Orgler6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGage Switzer / Ellen Taylor vs Shelly Williams / Johnny Hisaw6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-15vs Byrd/OSTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesEvan Chubb / Allison Ward vs Heidi St. Amant / Lennon Rea6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRenaldo Jordan / Carly Nichols Coy vs Andrea May / Duane Mcpeek3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Vance / Chase Bradford vs Lynsie Battles / Wade Hardy3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Juraszek/Ward7117718193
2BBTC - Descher44111333237
3Byrd/OSTC26101430217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Carly Nichols Coy
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.94
Evan Chubb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Lisa Mabry Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Chase Bradford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Hollie Miller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Renaldo Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
William van Kirk
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.58
Allison Ward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Gage Switzer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Jeffrey Ward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Ellen Taylor
published 4
Benjamin Vance
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Amber Juraszek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renaldo Jordan + Carly Nichols Coy5160% games−5.3% vs expected
Renaldo Jordan + Chase Bradford5063% gamesnot enough data
Evan Chubb + Allison Ward4151% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Mabry Smith + Jeffrey Ward303 matchesnot enough data
Renaldo Jordan + Hollie Miller123 matchesnot enough data
Evan Chubb + Carly Nichols Coy213 matchesnot enough data
Gage Switzer + Carly Nichols Coy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carly Nichols Coy
60W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Evan Chubb
24W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Lisa Mabry Smith
14W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Chase Bradford
25W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Hollie Miller
32W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Renaldo Jordan
34W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
William van Kirk
27W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.66
4
Allison Ward
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Gage Switzer
28W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Jeffrey Ward
43W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
4
Ellen Taylor
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Benjamin Vance
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Amber Juraszek
56W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.