Teams

Tonks/YMCA/Foothills

2023 Foothills Tri-Level - 18 & over · Women's Group B 3.0-3.5-4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-15vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarson Helsper / Taylor Newton vs Courtney Haan / Susan Knowles1-6, 4-6
2023-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelli Schmidt / Carson Helsper vs Tamara Woods / Deborah Pitts6-0, 6-3
2023-06-27vs Steele/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarson Helsper / Kelli Schmidt vs Marsha Diamonti / Andrea Banks3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-26vs Diamonti/LHCC B2/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarson Helsper / Elise Wright vs Meghan Young / Rebecca Tate6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group B 3.0-3.5-4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Karen Tonks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Ellen Stupka
published 4
3.68
Candace Scott
published 4
3.66
3.56
Kelli Schmidt
published
3.45
Carson Helsper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Dawn Owens
published 4
3.37
Megan Reid
published
3.12
Cori Peters
published 3.5
3.00
Jennifer Dufour
published
2.66
Olivia Good
published
2.61
DEBORAH OBERLE
published 3
Taylor Newton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Stupka + Karen Tonks4452% games−5.3% vs expected
Megan Reid + Carson Helsper224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Tonks
123W–132L career · 12 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ellen Stupka
73W–37L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Candace Scott
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Charlotte Hartman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Kelli Schmidt
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Carson Helsper
144W–110L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
4
Dawn Owens
3W–18L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Megan Reid
25W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Cori Peters
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jennifer Dufour
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
Olivia Good
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
DEBORAH OBERLE
3W–16L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Taylor Newton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.