Teams

Chaney/Beeler TLC

Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.07 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs HHTL40/Archibald/PRRCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Galvin / Jane Ravey vs Christine Hutchings / Harriet Pollitzer6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTerri Chaney / Marvlyn Vigilant vs Cynthia Duvall / Michele Archibald3-6, 3-6
2026-08-23vs HHTL40/Castricone/PRRCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Smith / Helen Johnson vs Lydia Vaughan / Shelley Humes6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLindsey Beeler / Jill MacLaughlin vs Michelle Monahan / Hamlin Smith1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Lisa Brousseau
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Adele Muller
published 4
3.91
Jane Ravey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.91
Anna Levonyak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Anne Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Heather Galvin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Katie Helmly
published
3.80
Ashley Hahn
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Julie Higgs
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Jennifer Stupica
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Robertson
published 4
3.71
Helen Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Terri Chaney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Jill MacLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Beeler
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Marvlyn Vigilant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill MacLaughlin + Terri Chaney134 matchesnot enough data
Terri Chaney + Jane Ravey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Brousseau
29W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Adele Muller
22W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
Jane Ravey
24W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Anna Levonyak
99W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Anne Brooks
72W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.89
4.5
Heather Galvin
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.85
Katie Helmly
26W–20L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Ashley Hahn
48W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Julie Higgs
31W–33L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
Jennifer Stupica
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
3.78
4
Amy Robertson
67W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Helen Johnson
44W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Terri Chaney
40W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Jill MacLaughlin
44W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Lindsey Beeler
33W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marvlyn Vigilant
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.