Teams

Love All

2024 TRI-Level · Women's- 4.5,4.0,3.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-17vs Shanks A LotWon 21
L#1 DoublesClaudia Villari / Emily Hoy vs Jennifer Fejfar / Lindsay Chase1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCristina Ramos / Sophia Prieto vs Valerie Kilpatrick / Lisa Tucci6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHolly Knutson / Lauren Baker vs Allison Getty / Telia Curtis6-3, 6-1
2024-11-17vs Lung BustersWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Villari / Kristin Shilson vs Jubie Wolfe / Maggie Winchell6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrenda Whinery / Giuliana Rodriguez vs Linda Haycraft / Valerie Smith7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesGeeta Sandberg / Christine Johnson vs Linda Arnaud / Lise Fox1-6, 1-6
2024-11-16vs Tri HarderWon 30
W#1 DoublesClaudia Villari / Emily Hoy vs Kristin Stoddard / Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSophia Prieto / Brenda Whinery vs Erika Hard / Birgit Allmann-Treusch6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGeeta Sandberg / Holly Knutson vs Amy Millett / Suo Ji6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-16vs SAZ Tri-Level WomensWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Hoy / Kristin Shilson vs Francesca Brennan / Stephanie Zibrat3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCristina Ramos / Giuliana Rodriguez vs Andrea Murphy / Tamra Williamson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Baker / Christine Johnson vs Kris Silverman / Marie-Louis Galegor7-5, 7-6
2024-11-16vs Duece a dramaWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Hoy / Kristin Shilson vs Michelle Heritage / Eunju Park6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGiuliana Rodriguez / Cristina Ramos vs Holly Polston / Teri Kotalik6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTricia Owen / Lauren Baker vs Lori Rogers / Nancy Paulson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-15vs Hall of FramersLost 12
W#1 DoublesClaudia Villari / Emily Hoy vs Tiffany Hodges / Nicole Gavin6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSophia Prieto / Holly Knutson vs Caroline Phelps / Elizabeth Taylor2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Johnson / Tricia Owen vs Linda Albert / Amy Howerter0-6, 4-6
2024-11-15vs Triple ThreatLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy O'Neil / Giuliana Rodriguez vs Jane Hagerty / Genevieve Leavitt7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCristina Ramos / Brenda Whinery vs Sharon Steehler / Susan Lee1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGeeta Sandberg / Lauren Baker vs Leah Ward / Jacqueline Lapan2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's- 4.5,4.0,3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Claudia Villari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Emily Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Kristin Shilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Holly Knutson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Cristina Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Cindy O'Neil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Giuliana Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Sophia Prieto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Tricia Owen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Geeta Sandberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Brenda Whinery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Christine Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lauren Baker
published
Sandra Saad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristina Ramos + Sophia Prieto7258% games+13.2% vs expected
Claudia Villari + Kristin Shilson4259% games+12.3% vs expected
Sandra Saad + Cristina Ramos6652% games+0.7% vs expected
Emily Hoy + Claudia Villari3351% games−2.0% vs expected
Sandra Saad + Sophia Prieto2938% games−9.9% vs expected
Brenda Whinery + Sandra Saad1634% games−11.2% vs expected
Geeta Sandberg + Lauren Baker404 matchesnot enough data
Christine Johnson + Geeta Sandberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Claudia Villari
88W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
4.49
4.5
Emily Hoy
43W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.28
Kristin Shilson
81W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
Holly Knutson
69W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Cristina Ramos
97W–83L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Cindy O'Neil
87W–46L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Giuliana Rodriguez
32W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Sophia Prieto
70W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Tricia Owen
70W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Geeta Sandberg
75W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Brenda Whinery
62W–126L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Christine Johnson
45W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Lauren Baker
20W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Saad
46W–85L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.