Teams

Arseneault/18/3.0/WN/Legacy

2025 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.0 (18&O) Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.15 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings9 teams · 3.0 (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Arseneault/18/3.0/WN/Legacy10044617252
2Mansur/18/3.0/WN/YMCA91401024245
3Holeman/18/3.0/WN/BREC82371334324
4JSmith/18/3.0/WN/BREC73341638349
5Saporito/18/3.0/WN/BREC46242658423
6CSmith/18/3.0/WN/CCLA46212961459
7Lafleur/18/3.0/WN/BREC19133776516
8Kennedy/18/3.0/WN/BREC1974387543
9Heitman/18/3.0/WN/BREC01054591574

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Jena Vavasseur
published
3.37
Merrill Reeves
published
3.36
Megan Trahant
published
3.33
DAO DANG
published 3.5
3.31
Aleah Arseneault
published 3.5
3.18
Danielle Pearson
published 3
3.17
Eva Hannegan
published 3.5
3.16
3.09
Cortney Wagner
published 3
2.94
Bree Hughes
published 3
2.93
Emily Parks
published 3
2.77
Olivia Barry
published
2.59
Emily Mouledous
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DAO DANG + Aleah Arseneault6168% games+26.2% vs expected
Megan Trahant + Jena Vavasseur7169% games+17.9% vs expected
Megan Trahant + Aleah Arseneault17562% games+15.6% vs expected
Eva Hannegan + Jena Vavasseur11267% games+10.3% vs expected
Megan Trahant + Danielle Pearson6267% games+9.4% vs expected
DAO DANG + Cortney Wagner9555% games+3.5% vs expected
DAO DANG + Olivia Barry404 matchesnot enough data
DAO DANG + Megan Trahant213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jena Vavasseur
86W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Merrill Reeves
19W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Megan Trahant
106W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
DAO DANG
71W–37L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Aleah Arseneault
71W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3
Danielle Pearson
97W–39L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.18
3.5
Eva Hannegan
66W–21L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Grace Murrell Spires
50W–26L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Cortney Wagner
64W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Bree Hughes
28W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Emily Parks
38W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Olivia Barry
37W–26L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anne Elise Manning
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Emily Mouledous
14W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.