Teams

ROUND HILL CC CW6.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-02vs ROUND HILL CC CW6.5CLost 12
L#1 DoublesCecily Barclay / Elizabeth Ball vs Jill Carlstrom / Mickie Kerr1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Peck / Rebecca Bergman vs Kara Chizever / Julie Rossing6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLea Baldacci / Maria Angel-Ordonez vs Katie Hedden / Kristi Carter4-6, 3-6
2025-08-25vs ROUND HILL CC CW6.5CWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatie Hamlin / Farrell Pappas vs Christine Brashear / Mihaela Farnholtz2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline D Sherbourne / Rebecca Bergman vs Christine Reiners / Mickie Kerr7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Takano-Peters / Wendy Thomas vs Megan Kovacs / Kerry Maunus6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Caroline D Sherbourne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Cecily Barclay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Suzanne Peck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Shirley Coke
published
3.22
Farrell Pappas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristen Loughmiller
published
3.14
Rebecca Bergman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Lea Baldacci
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Katie Hamlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Julie Takano-Peters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Mimi Cattermole
published
2.72
Jennifer Stein
published
2.55
Maria Angel-Ordonez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Kuldip Chohan
published
Julie Peloquin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Cecily Barclay
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Suzanne Peck
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Shirley Coke
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Hilary Andersen Hurlbut
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Farrell Pappas
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Kristen Loughmiller
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Rebecca Bergman
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Lea Baldacci
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Katie Hamlin
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
Julie Takano-Peters
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%32%
2.94
Mimi Cattermole
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.90
Jennifer Stein
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.72
Simone van der Waart van Gulik
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Maria Angel-Ordonez
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
0%35%65%
2.55
Kuldip Chohan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Julie Peloquin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.