Teams

Escambia/Andresen/18&Over7.0X

2025 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-06vs Fabbro - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Smith / Jasmine Agadzi vs Abigail Nelson / Addison van Pelt3-6, 5-7
2025-07-30vs Punch - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Smith / Jasmine Agadzi vs Marie Steen / KL LeCOQ6-1, 6-1
2025-07-23vs O'Neill - PCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJasmine Agadzi / Christopher Brown vs Michael Yager / Creagh Ekelund3-6, 3-6
2025-07-16vs Tran - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJasmine Agadzi / Christopher Brown vs Beata Antal / Robert Cruise6-1, 6-4
2025-07-09vs Davies - PCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Andresen / Steven Bingert vs Grace Harvey / Kyle Harvey6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAdele Dorion / Alexander Weil vs Margaret-anne West / Scott Goossens6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJenya Burkett / Bennett Gaston vs Brad Mathis / Megan Frederick4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-02vs Struck - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJasmine Agadzi / Christopher Brown vs Marco Fuentealba / Dodi Stringfellow6-4, 6-0
2025-06-25vs Abel - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Brown / Jasmine Agadzi vs Kristyn Miller / Jerry Clark7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Bennett Gaston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Adele Dorion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Ive Marsach
published
3.82
3.80
Brian Weil
published 4
3.63
Lisa Andresen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Steven Bingert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Jasmine Agadzi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Pressly Weil
published
2.76
Jenya Burkett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Alexander Weil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bennett Gaston
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Adele Dorion
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Ive Marsach
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Christopher Brown
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Brian Weil
7W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Lisa Andresen
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Steven Bingert
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Jasmine Agadzi
16W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Pressly Weil
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jenya Burkett
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Alexander Weil
3W–2L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.