Teams

Fred Wells Sollenberger 12:30pm

2023 Women's Daytime Doubles · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-03-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs / Jennifer Frascone vs Kathy Jungquist / Alison Cook6-7, 5-3
2023-02-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Frascone / Jamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Patty Barr / Stephanie Stackhouse6-4, 7-6
2022-11-18vs Williston Wolden 11:00amLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Frascone / Jamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Stephanie Stackhouse / Lisa LaCombe4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clay Sollenberger
published 4.5
3.83
Janice Ring
published
3.80
Michelle Finley
published
3.79
Claire Townsend
published 4
3.79
Laura Dale
published
3.75
Leah Paul
published
3.56
Sharon Larkins
published
3.55
Suzy Griffith
published
3.49
Sarah Curfman
published
3.45
3.43
Jennifer Frascone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Michele Mingo
published
3.34
Jeanne Ewen
published
3.33
Jeanne Elert
published
3.27
Marsha Fosburgh
published
Kelly Bomier
published
Teri Carlisano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Ring + Suzy Griffith141549% games+3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clay Sollenberger
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janice Ring
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Michelle Finley
35W–50L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Claire Townsend
31W–27L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Laura Dale
18W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Leah Paul
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Sharon Larkins
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Suzy Griffith
17W–20L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sarah Curfman
58W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jamie Lukehart-Hobbs
27W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jennifer Frascone
101W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Michele Mingo
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Jeanne Ewen
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Jeanne Elert
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
Marsha Fosburgh
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Kelly Bomier
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teri Carlisano
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.