Teams

SCC Totaro

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-22vs Westwood WatkinsLost 01
L#1 SinglesCaroline Andrews vs Allison Woodruff4-6, 2-6
2022-07-20vs Burkwood JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Becky McNeer vs Lisa Mallory / Susan Pennino6-1, 6-2
2022-07-15vs Three Chopt DeValkWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Kristin Kim vs Meghan Pearsall / Beth Jones4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJulie Kearfott vs Felicia Schooley6-1, 6-2
2022-07-13vs Bon Air MillerWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Kristin Kim vs Jeanne Albright / Kimberly Rabb6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Sarah Boyd vs Robin Balsamo / Linda Kidd7-5, 6-3
2022-07-06vs Twin Hickory SubramanainLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Kim / Caroline Andrews vs Corinne Skevington / Jennifer Schwarz4-6, 3-6
2022-07-01vs ACAC Cheatham / HoeferLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Sarah Boyd vs Neki Grant / Tatiana Smirnov2-6, 0-6
2022-06-29vs Woodlake CookseyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Sarah Boyd vs Susan Zielinski / Tami Chalker0-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Heather Benedetti
published 3.5
3.53
Becky McNeer
published 3.5
3.33
Julie Kearfott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Kristin Kim
published
3.14
Virginia Totaro
published
3.09
Caroline Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Jessica Steinour
published
3.04
Annmarie Strachan
published 3.5
3.04
Stacey Piotrowski
published
2.91
Laura Haskin
published
Nancy Sullivan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Benedetti + Kristin Kim13264% games+8.7% vs expected
Caroline Andrews + Julie Kearfott4452% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Piotrowski + Virginia Totaro314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Benedetti
29W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Becky McNeer
30W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Julie Kearfott
146W–104L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Kristin Kim
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Virginia Totaro
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Caroline Andrews
69W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jessica Steinour
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Annmarie Strachan
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Stacey Piotrowski
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Laura Haskin
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.91
Nancy Sullivan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.