Teams

HOPKINS PK 18AW4.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Aiko Kanai
published 4.5
4.47
Chika Horie
published 4.5
4.35
Caroline Raynaud
published 4.5
4.34
Wendy Cheng
published
4.29
Kirsten Tasker
published
4.23
Daniella Holm
published 4.5
4.23
Erika Byrum
published
4.22
Veeraya Pupatwibul
published
4.21
Yuko Mihara
published
4.19
Sayaka Kishino
published
4.13
Kiyoe Hashimoto
published
4.11
Jessica Ma
published
4.02
Jana Chang
published
4.01
Nicole Stephens
published
3.95
Srinidhi Chari
published
3.95
Jie Kong
published
3.89
Patty Cheng
published
3.88
June Ong
published
3.81
Michelle DeGuzman
published
3.65
Chen Xiao
published 4.5
Silvia Oliveros
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Stephens + Kiyoe Hashimoto5358% games+18.7% vs expected
Aiko Kanai + Yuko Mihara404 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Cheng + Nicole Stephens033 matchesnot enough data
Daniella Holm + Veeraya Pupatwibul213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aiko Kanai
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
4.58
4.5
Chika Horie
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
Caroline Raynaud
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
4.35
Wendy Cheng
23W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.34
Kirsten Tasker
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Daniella Holm
26W–15L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Erika Byrum
21W–15L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Veeraya Pupatwibul
23W–16L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Yuko Mihara
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Sayaka Kishino
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Kiyoe Hashimoto
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
Jessica Ma
55W–23L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
Jana Chang
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Nicole Stephens
29W–36L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
Srinidhi Chari
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.95
Jie Kong
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.95
Patty Cheng
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.89
June Ong
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.88
Michelle DeGuzman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.81
4.5
Chen Xiao
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.65
Silvia Oliveros
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.