← Teams

IRV-Townsend

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.22 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Heather Matteri
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Julia Plowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Wendy Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Erin Gleason
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Laurel Hallock Koppelman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Michelle Boucher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Deborah Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Ashley Bevan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Megan Ullmann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWendy Schmidt / Julia Plowman vs Claudia Porter / Lori Farrell6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Ullmann / Sarie Crothers vs Susan Wang / Minnie Bautista6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesErin Gleason / Anita Palodichuk vs Keiko Okumura / Yayun Tung6-2, 6-3
2022-06-04Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWendy Schmidt / Julia Plowman vs Molly Hemsley / Wendi Ouellette3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErin Gleason / Deborah Cohen vs KC Bildner / Alana Miner6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDenise Townsend / Ashley Bevan vs Nicola Ash / JULIE GIBSON6-1, 6-4
2022-05-21Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMegan Ullmann / Sarie Crothers vs Nicole Norby / Shuping Li6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAshley Bevan / Heather Matteri vs Jennifer Tobin / Laura Rich6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDenise Townsend / Laurel Hallock Koppelman vs Lynda Gordon / Lisa King7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-14Won 2–1
L#1 SinglesErin Gleason vs Adrienne Dedelow6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAnita Palodichuk / Megan Ullmann vs Rachael Seeger / Shelly Bigley7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaurel Hallock Koppelman / Dana Austin vs Kelly Goodman / Emily Becker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJulia Plowman / Leslie Sampson vs Penny Luong / Minnie Bautista6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Boucher / Eryn Hoerster vs Michelle Roach / Keiko Okumura3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Matteri / Tanya Doubleday vs Melissa Maxwell / Janet Hummel6-0, 6-0
2022-05-01Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesSarie Crothers / Megan Ullmann vs Karen Simon / Alma Siri6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennie Ehleringer / Heather Matteri vs Elena Rivera / Toni Mikel6-1, 6-3
2022-04-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMichelle Boucher / Leslie Sampson vs Dar Dragoon / Nina Hanson6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDenise Townsend / Laurel Hallock Koppelman vs Teufelin Traylen / Sarah Larson6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAshley Bevan / Tanya Doubleday vs Ilona Vondolovski / Carla Scott6-4, 6-2
2022-04-17Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMichelle Boucher / Eryn Hoerster vs Wendi Ouellette / Karin Owens6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarie Crothers / Deborah Cohen vs Elena Kochetkova / Nicola Ash6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAshley Bevan / Laurel Hallock Koppelman vs KC Bildner / Crystal Ounaphom6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heather Matteri
58W–30L career
0%97%3%
3.34
3.5
Julia Plowman
73W–28L career
6%94%1%
3.20
3.5
Wendy Schmidt
41W–32L career
26%74%0%
3.06
3.5
Erin Gleason
43W–17L career
35%65%0%
3.02
3
Laurel Hallock Koppelman
74W–75L career
0%97%3%
2.87
3
Michelle Boucher
45W–40L career
1%93%6%
2.85
3
Deborah Cohen
65W–38L career
0%99%1%
2.81
3
Ashley Bevan
36W–28L career
1%98%1%
2.79
3
Megan Ullmann
20W–15L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.