Teams

Bolles/18/3.0/MX/Reds

2026 LAF Mixed 18 & Over · 3.0 Laf (18&O) Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-09vs Bordelon/18/3.0/MX/BVRWon 20
W#1 DoublesJessica Champagne / Kavanaugh Danenberg vs Kelli Self / Dustin Deville6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShannon Artigue / Jeffrey Peatross vs Lori Comeaux / Ryan Farmer6-1, 6-1
2026-06-25vs Dade/18/3.0/MX/YSCWon 30
W#1 DoublesParker Harrell / Kavanaugh Danenberg vs Lacey Carrigee / Murray Dickens6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Champagne / Chandler Credeur vs Andrew DeCuir / Amyri Braud6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLogan Dupre / Alexander Dupre vs Emma Dowdy / Joshua Rush6-1, 6-1
2026-06-20vs Hesterly/18/3.0/MX/OCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesParker Harrell / Weston Simon vs Merritt Longman / Joseph Hesterly6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChandler Credeur / Isabel Marin vs Elise B Guidry / Gene Benoit6-2, 6-0
2026-06-18vs Hains/18/3.0/MX/CCRRWon 30
W#1 DoublesIsabel Marin / Nathan Hong vs Charles Hill / Lily Cowles6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShannon Artigue / Weston Simon vs Kyle Naomi / Kelli Guidry6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngelle Hollier / Phu Tran vs Angelle Vidrine / Malcolm Stubbs6-2, 6-0
2026-06-04vs PLAUCHE/18/3.0/MX/BSCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLindy Meaux / Nathan Hong vs George Hollier / Chloe Cordell6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLogan Dupre / Alexander Dupre vs Morgan Landry / Matthew Toce6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Rader / Jeffrey Peatross vs Jacob Montfort / Zully Maldonado6-4, 6-2
2026-05-28vs Boudreaux/18/3.0/MX/YSCWon 21
W#1 DoublesParker Harrell / Nathan Hong vs Gabrielle Bonin / Brock Bonin6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Artigue / Weston Simon vs Julie Hoskins / Daniel Maldonado3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesIsabel Marin / Alexander Dupre vs Morgan Boudreaux / Will Stevenson6-2, 6-3
2026-05-21vs Cormier/18/3.0/MX/OCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLindy Meaux / Chandler Credeur vs Doug Payne / Ann LeBlanc7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKavanaugh Danenberg / Parker Harrell vs Tonia Cormier / Damon Cormier6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngelle Hollier / Phu Tran vs Emily Jordan / Jeffrey Fooshee7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Laf (18&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bolles/18/3.0/MX/Reds70201269
2Boudreaux/18/3.0/MX/YSC6115614137
3Dade/18/3.0/MX/YSC5215613164
4Hains/18/3.0/MX/CCRR4312919156
5Cormier/18/3.0/MX/OCC2581328204
6Bordelon/18/3.0/MX/BVR2571430200
7PLAUCHE/18/3.0/MX/BSC1641734225
8Hesterly/18/3.0/MX/OCC1631837236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Parker Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Isabel Marin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.06
Angelle Hollier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Logan Dupre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Chandler Credeur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Lindy Meaux
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Kavanaugh Danenberg
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Jessica Champagne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Jeffrey Peatross
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Alexander Dupre
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Shannon Artigue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Weston Simon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.56
Lary Bolles
published
Rebecca Rader
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Peatross + Shannon Artigue5069% gamesnot enough data
Kavanaugh Danenberg + Parker Harrell404 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Rader + Kavanaugh Danenberg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parker Harrell
27W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.30
Isabel Marin
17W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Angelle Hollier
37W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Logan Dupre
54W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Chandler Credeur
26W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Lindy Meaux
25W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.98
Kavanaugh Danenberg
23W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Jessica Champagne
34W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Jeffrey Peatross
20W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Alexander Dupre
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Shannon Artigue
23W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Weston Simon
8W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Lary Bolles
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Rebecca Rader
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.