Teams

Bainbridge/Powell

2026 Bainbridge Southern Combo 18 & Over - Spring · Women 6.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-23vs Bainbridge/CoyleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Thomas / Susan O'Neal vs Deborah Doss / Deborah Wilkey2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesApril Powell / Brittney Chapman vs Susie Hartzog / Becca Harville5-7, 1-6
2026-06-16vs Bainbridge/CoyleLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrittney Chapman / Karan Barber vs Deborah Wilkey / Sheila Edwards2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-09vs Bainbridge/CoyleLost 02
L#1 DoublesApril Powell / Babs Coyle vs Claire Webb / Leigh Cooper6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Heard / Susan O'Neal vs Deborah Doss / Linda Cleveland0-6, 5-7
2026-06-02vs Bainbridge/CoyleWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoan Overman / Tammy Griffin vs Deborah Doss / Linda Cleveland4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrittney Chapman / Karan Barber vs Deborah Wilkey / Susie Hartzog3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-26vs Bainbridge/CoyleLost 12
W#1 DoublesBabs Coyle / Amy Thomas vs Sheryl Cannington / Becca Harville6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTammy Griffin / Karan Barber vs Claire Webb / Ashley Spat3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrittney Chapman / Susan O'Neal vs Deborah Wilkey / Susie Hartzog4-6, 2-6
2026-05-19vs Bainbridge/CoyleLost 01
L#1 DoublesBabs Coyle / Karan Barber vs Becca Harville / Sheila Edwards3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bainbridge/Coyle4210818147
2Bainbridge/Powell2471125167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Joan Overman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Karan Barber
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
April Powell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Melanie Feliz
published
2.90
Carol Heard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Susan O'Neal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Babs Coyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Babs Coyle + Susan O'Neal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joan Overman
32W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Karan Barber
11W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
April Powell
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Melanie Feliz
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3.5
Carol Heard
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90
Susan O'Neal
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Babs Coyle
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.