Teams

MEMPK HILTON

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-23vs PBTC TUCKERWon 50
W#1 DoublesRebecca Martin / Stefanie McCarron vs Martina Lang / Jeannette Ortiz6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesShinobu Voss vs Rebecca VanBuskirk2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Ross / Julie Matheson vs Leah Ann Tucker / Ursula Duran6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJessica Hilton vs Stephanie Gifford6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Siegel / Roni Schlagel vs Paula Henson / Julie Larson6-2, 6-1
2022-05-16vs CSRC HENRYWon 41
W#1 DoublesJudy Flaherty / Karen Ross vs Jennifer Mutka / Chie Okubo6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJessica Hilton vs Stephanie King5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRoni Schlagel / Tonya Duval vs Kady Hommel / Amy Laird6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesShinobu Voss vs Carolayne Henry6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRebecca Martin / Ankie Richard vs Sara Breese / Wendy Rhoten3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-05-09vs FLYHS LEVKUSWon 32
L#1 DoublesRebecca Martin / Stefanie McCarron vs Leslie Jaworowski / Maggie Wilson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJessica Hilton vs Martina Levkus6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJudy Flaherty / Karen Ross vs Kristi Creps / Jamie Roach4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesShinobu Voss vs Elayna Rathmann6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRoni Schlagel / Nancy Siegel vs Amy Saxby / Chelsey Wright3-6, 3-6
2022-05-02vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERLost 23
L#1 DoublesTina Watson / Ankie Richard vs Kateri Kaltenbacher / Salome D'Silva6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesShinobu Voss vs Gina D'Silva7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRebecca Martin / Stefanie McCarron vs Susan Hilton / Cindy Yetter6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesKaren Ross vs Shirley Stange2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Flaherty / Julie Matheson vs Chantel Rosario / WENDY WESTON6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-25vs CCOC MAYLESWon 50
W#1 DoublesRoni Schlagel / Nancy Siegel vs Andrea Frazee / Kelly Banet6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesShinobu Voss vs Jillian Mayles6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Martin / Stefanie McCarron vs Barbi Bailey / Erin Hubert6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJessica Hilton vs Leah Derksen6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTina Watson / Tonya Duval vs Lara Rowell / Paige Bartol6-1, 6-0
2022-04-18vs PBTC TUCKERWon 50
W#1 DoublesJudy Flaherty / Karen Ross vs Ursula Duran / Leah Ann Tucker6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesShinobu Voss vs Stephanie Gifford6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Siegel / Roni Schlagel vs Rochelle Beier-Kemmet / Julie Larson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJessica Hilton vs Rebecca VanBuskirk6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Martin / Ankie Richard vs Jeannette Ortiz / Alyssa Parga6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Ankie Richard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Judy Flaherty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Jessica Hilton
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.12
Rebecca Martin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Karen Ross
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.81
Stefanie McCarron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Nancy Siegel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Tina Watson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Matheson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roni Schlagel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Shinobu Voss
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Tonya Duval
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Ross + Judy Flaherty4357% games+8.2% vs expected
Roni Schlagel + Nancy Siegel281058% games+5.0% vs expected
Ankie Richard + Judy Flaherty11757% games+3.9% vs expected
Ankie Richard + Rebecca Martin15754% games+0.9% vs expected
Stefanie McCarron + Shinobu Voss5358% games−4.9% vs expected
Tonya Duval + Tina Watson1547% gamesnot enough data
Ankie Richard + Shinobu Voss6072% gamesnot enough data
Stefanie McCarron + Rebecca Martin3262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ankie Richard
130W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Judy Flaherty
79W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
Jessica Hilton
99W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Rebecca Martin
37W–50L career · 6 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.12
Karen Ross
54W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.84
Stefanie McCarron
68W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Nancy Siegel
83W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Tina Watson
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Julie Matheson
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Roni Schlagel
50W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shinobu Voss
55W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tonya Duval
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.