Teams

TAmos/VSofarelli (WSRC)

2023 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-26Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMartha Lowman vs Karen Allen3-6, 2-6
2023-07-19vs AStover/MLeisure (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesMartha Lowman vs Sridevi Ganesan1-6, 4-6
2023-07-12vs KMacrone (BCC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStacey Herndon vs Sonia Waters0-6, 0-6
2023-07-05vs KDay (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 SinglesJurga Petrikis vs Jimena Lozano de Bermudez3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesStacey Herndon vs Anne Schmitt7-5, 6-1
2023-06-28vs VTolson (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMartha Lowman vs Jennifer Voci2-6, 1-6
2023-06-18vs KCurley (Raintree)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJurga Petrikis vs Kimberlee Curley4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesStacey Herndon vs Katrina Richards1-6, 5-7
2023-06-14vs BBaker (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesStacey Herndon vs Brittany Baker6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMartha Lowman vs Anna Sison4-6, 1-6
2023-05-31vs AStover/MLeisure (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJurga Petrikis vs Melissa Leisure1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesStacey Herndon vs Wendy Rossi1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
3.01
Stacey Herndon
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
3.00
Rhonda Tate
published
2.81
Jurga Petrikis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.72
Martha Lowman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.67
Kristina Campbell
published
2.29
Tracy Amos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Sofarelli + Stacey Herndon404 matchesnot enough data
Jurga Petrikis + Stacey Herndon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Victoria Sofarelli
169W–83L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Stacey Herndon
103W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
Rhonda Tate
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Jurga Petrikis
62W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Martha Lowman
43W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Kristina Campbell
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%11%89%
2.67
Tracy Amos
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.