Teams

The Notorious Ninjas

2023 18&Over Women Winter · 3.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-06vs Dream TeamLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristen Striano / Victoria Reznik vs Erina Watts / Kylie Haymaker3-6, 2-6
2023-03-30vs Stop The LobLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Striano / Dima Mousselli vs Nina Lo / Tracy Nitche1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVictoria Reznik / Jaime Shapiro vs Mary Walsh / Nicole Egan3-6, 5-7
2023-03-16vs Dream TeamLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Stanyek / Kristen Striano vs Cynda Kliewe / Maria LaGratta3-6, 4-6
2023-03-09vs Stop The LobLost 01
L#2 DoublesVictoria Reznik / Lori Bennett vs Meaghan Haynes / Soula Lambrou2-6, 3-6
2023-02-23vs Dream TeamLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Striano / Carolyn Stanyek vs Dani Crooker / Kristy DeCresce5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDima Mousselli / Victoria Reznik vs Amy Greenberg / Leigh Tsang2-6, 5-7
2023-02-02vs Dream TeamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVictoria Reznik / Dima Mousselli vs Nora King / Cynda Kliewe4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Striano / Carolyn Stanyek vs Tami Sasala / Kylie Haymaker7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Notorious Ninjas012143474506

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Sarah Chin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Lori Bennett
published
3.36
Carolyn Stanyek
published 3.5
3.32
Victoria Reznik
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Laureena McCormack
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.26
Simona Satruc
published
3.26
Irene Hall
published 3.5
Cathy Kruse
published 3.5
Frances Pinto
published 3.5
3.21
Catherine Eby
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Kristen Striano
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Jennifer Buckwald
published
3.14
Mandy Carri
published
3.12
Karen Hinds
published
3.00
Dima Mousselli
published 3.5
2.97
Patty Humes
published
2.81
Jaime Shapiro
published 3
2.79
Kim Silberman
published
2.71
Jamie Stavola
published 3
Lanae Herman
published
Melissa Stevenson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Silberman + Kristen Striano8751% games+10.6% vs expected
Kristen Striano + Sarah Chin3261% games+9.6% vs expected
Victoria Reznik + Laureena McCormack101252% games+6.5% vs expected
Carolyn Stanyek + Lori Bennett15954% games+3.2% vs expected
Dima Mousselli + Kristen Striano14857% games+2.1% vs expected
Carolyn Stanyek + Karen Hinds8754% games+1.6% vs expected
Dima Mousselli + Carolyn Stanyek121648% games+0.4% vs expected
Patty Humes + Jaime Shapiro6848% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Chin
70W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
Lori Bennett
96W–137L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Carolyn Stanyek
112W–83L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Victoria Reznik
110W–110L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Laureena McCormack
92W–67L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Simona Satruc
39W–38L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Irene Hall
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cathy Kruse
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Frances Pinto
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Eby
38W–22L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Kristen Striano
118W–126L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Buckwald
26W–52L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.15
Mandy Carri
51W–60L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Karen Hinds
28W–37L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Dima Mousselli
54W–64L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Patty Humes
62W–38L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Jaime Shapiro
76W–87L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Kim Silberman
44W–43L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Jamie Stavola
26W–28L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
Lanae Herman
40W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Stevenson
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.