Teams

De.Farmer40A3.0M

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-01vs Sh.Skillman40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesChauncey Hatcher / Ra Yasin vs Shawn Skillman / Harrison Edwards2-6, 3-6
2024-04-24vs Jo.Nance40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesChauncey Hatcher / Ra Yasin vs Joel Nance / Kevin Nguyen2-6, 0-6
2024-04-10vs Ry.Garrett40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesCarl Anthony / Ra Yasin vs Scott Lundy / Casey Smith2-6, 3-6
2024-04-03vs Jo.Allessio40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesChauncey Hatcher / Ra Yasin vs John Allessio / Jeffrey Miller3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dempsey Farmer
published 4.5
2.81
Ra Yasin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carl Anthony
published 3
2.72
Elliott Blades
published
2.70
Donzell Newkirk
published
2.68
John van Ness
published
2.61
Michael Benecky
published
2.60
Lawrence Pollard
published
2.56
Chauncey Hatcher
published 3
2.30
George Hallowell
published
2.28
Gary Carlson
published
Patrick Faulkner
published
Ricardo Davalos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Hallowell + Gary Carlson044 matchesnot enough data
John van Ness + Elliott Blades303 matchesnot enough data
Lawrence Pollard + Chauncey Hatcher033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dempsey Farmer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ra Yasin
51W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Carl Anthony
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elliott Blades
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Donzell Newkirk
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
John van Ness
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Michael Benecky
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.61
Lawrence Pollard
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Chauncey Hatcher
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
George Hallowell
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.30
Gary Carlson
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
2.28
Patrick Faulkner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ricardo Davalos
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.