Teams

Hasling-55/3.5/M/Franco's

2026 Man · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Arthur-55/3.5/M/StoneCreek7120416173
2Oubre- 55/3.5/M/Pelican3591531233
3Hasling-55/3.5/M/Franco's2671738252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
David Bachemin
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.39
Chris Riso
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.23
Bryan Quarls
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Damon Morise
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Bill Bass
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Eric Stegen
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
James Tickner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
John Munoz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kenny Wollfarth
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 47% · published
Mark Mercante
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 7% · published
Pen Clark
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Randy Hasling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Timothy Hoy
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Bachemin + Kenny Wollfarth4348% gamesnot enough data
Chris Riso + Bryan Quarls2353% gamesnot enough data
Eric Stegen + Timothy Hoy134 matchesnot enough data
James Tickner + Kenny Wollfarth134 matchesnot enough data
Bill Bass + Kenny Wollfarth134 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Hoy + Randy Hasling134 matchesnot enough data
James Tickner + Bill Bass033 matchesnot enough data
James Tickner + Mark Mercante123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Bachemin
12W–13L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Chris Riso
8W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Bryan Quarls
8W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Damon Morise
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Bill Bass
15W–20L career · 20 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Eric Stegen
7W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
James Tickner
16W–23L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Munoz
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kenny Wollfarth
16W–22L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Mercante
8W–6L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pen Clark
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy Hasling
10W–22L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Hoy
12W–22L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.