Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Sara Asatiani

2021 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-16vs CV-Palm Springs TC/Woods/FoxWon 10
W#2 DoublesSara Asatiani / Nadine Kim vs Staci Munic / Molly Woods7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNadine Kim / Celeste Manolas vs Gina Orban / Sanae Chance7-6, 7-5
2021-05-02vs CV-Andalusia CC/L KilburnWon 20
W#2 DoublesLesley Gagnon / Nadine Kim vs Debra Creem / Ailee Robertson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSara Asatiani / Kim Kouwabunpat vs Lori Kilburn / Carol Shaw6-1, 6-0
2021-05-01vs CV-Indian Wells TG/Jo Burns BalinWon 10
W#2 DoublesNadine Kim / Lesley Gagnon vs Teresa Makhijani / Lori Tanking4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesNadine Kim / Lesley Gagnon vs Georgette LePage / Judith Brauer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCeleste Manolas / Nadine Kim vs Holly Simmons / Meg Zoretic7-6, 6-4
2021-04-18vs LLW-CV-Rancho La Quinta/S YoungSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNadine Kim / Lesley Gagnon vs Melanie Ditton / Lisa Symmonds2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSara Asatiani / Kim Kouwabunpat vs Rebecca Brown / Paula Buononato7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Kim Kouwabunpat
published
3.61
Sally Mangina
published 4
3.51
Celeste Manolas
published 3.5
3.34
Nadine Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Lesley Gagnon
published
3.16
Sara Asatiani
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Julie Ongaro
published
Ledean Nilsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nadine Kim + Lesley Gagnon13457% games−6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Kouwabunpat
6W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
4.36
4
Sally Mangina
127W–117L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Celeste Manolas
5W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.51
Nadine Kim
90W–96L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.34
Lesley Gagnon
16W–17L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Sara Asatiani
51W–96L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
Julie Ongaro
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ledean Nilsen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.