Williams

2025 · 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

Flight standings for 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33

Crissy Davis

usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5

3.02

Jennifer Kerce

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

2.89

Karlene Welty

usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published —

2.86

Catrina Mashburn

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.85

Debi Williams

usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.83

Lisa Goble

usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published —

2.82

Christi Bennett

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.79

Julie Graves

usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published —

2.73

Pam Mills

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —

2.70

Simone Ford

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —

2.63

Samantha Watson

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

2.53

Vivian White

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Simone Ford + Debi Williams	6–2	60% games	+16.8% vs expected
Catrina Mashburn + Samantha Watson	4–2	58% games	+14.7% vs expected
Crissy Davis + Jennifer Kerce	4–2	66% games	+14.6% vs expected
Catrina Mashburn + Jennifer Kerce	6–1	69% games	+9.3% vs expected
Pam Mills + Jennifer Kerce	10–7	53% games	−5.7% vs expected
Christi Bennett + Debi Williams	2–3	51% games	not enough data
Catrina Mashburn + Pam Mills	1–3	4 matches	not enough data
Christi Bennett + Simone Ford	2–1	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

Crissy Davis

72W–29L career · 11 lines in 2026

<1%89%10%

3.33

—

Jennifer Kerce

60W–30L career · 8 lines in 2026

<1%44%56%

3.02

—

Karlene Welty

22W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%81%19%

2.89

Catrina Mashburn

41W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026

<1%85%14%

2.86

Debi Williams

30W–39L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%88%12%

2.85

—

Lisa Goble

19W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026

1%90%10%

2.83

Christi Bennett

7W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026

1%91%8%

2.82

—

Julie Graves

19W–26L career · 9 lines in 2026

1%94%5%

2.79

—

Pam Mills

53W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026

4%94%2%

2.73

—

Simone Ford

14W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026

6%93%1%

2.70

—

Samantha Watson

15W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026

16%83%<1%

2.63

—

Vivian White

28W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026

40%60%<1%

2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.