Teams

Team 6 Belle Haven

2023 NOVA Mixed 40 & Over · NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-25vs Team 2Split 11
W#1 DoublesKaj Vetter / LeighAnn Jackson vs Alice Ling / Anthony Chang5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Darling / Lisa Karlisch vs Carrie Gray / Helmut Klemperer5-7, 2-6
2023-06-18vs Team 5Won 10
W#2 DoublesPatrick Bransford / Lisa Karlisch vs Aravind Krishna / Genea Kennedy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-11vs Team 5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeighAnn Jackson / Kaj Vetter vs John Doe / Lorraine Tacinelli5-7, 6-6
2023-06-04vs Team 7 Stars & StripesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaj Vetter / LeighAnn Jackson vs Todd Schneider / Suzanne Marisa6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHenry Fonvielle / Lisa Karlisch vs ERIK WITTREICH / Dana Moss5-7, 1-6
2023-05-21vs Team 3 Grace's AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaj Vetter / LeighAnn Jackson vs Kenneth Fowler / Andrea Gevas3-6, 6-7
2023-05-03vs Team 3 Grace's AcesLost 02
L#2 DoublesKaj Vetter / Lisa Karlisch vs Leah Noonan / PHI-LONG NGUYEN-THANH3-6, 5-4
L#3 DoublesAndrew Duke / LeighAnn Jackson vs Cindy Pham / Richard Wang0-6, 1-6
2023-04-24vs Team 7 Stars & StripesLost 02
L#2 DoublesKaj Vetter / LeighAnn Jackson vs Marc Short / Jessica Harris6-7, 4-4
L#3 DoublesHenry Fonvielle / Lisa Karlisch vs Ronda Estridge / Daniel Hampton2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Bruce MacHanic
published
3.95
John O'Dwyer
published
3.79
Scott Darling
published
3.75
Kaj Vetter
published
3.68
LeighAnn Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Lisa Karlisch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.40
Stephanie Elsheikh
published
3.31
Kate Coler
published
3.08
Andrew Duke
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Bruce MacHanic
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
John O'Dwyer
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.95
Scott Darling
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.79
Kaj Vetter
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
4
LeighAnn Jackson
51W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Lisa Karlisch
40W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
Stephanie Elsheikh
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
Kate Coler
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.31
3.5
Andrew Duke
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.