Teams

Capobianco CFCC

2026 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.5 Women 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-01vs GainerLost 02
L#2 SinglesHayden Kirby vs Andrea Talley2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesKimberly Shipley vs Elizabeth Spale1-6, 1-6
2026-02-28vs HanlyWon 10
W#3 SinglesStephanie Gould vs Molly Hanly4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-20vs HanlyLost 12
L#1 SinglesSarah Beth Deans vs Julia Mattingly4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Capobianco vs Meghan McKeithan4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesSarah McLamb vs Molly Hanly7-5, 6-2
2026-02-18vs Dameron 18+Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKelly Capobianco vs Evelyn Foster1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Beth Deans vs Kris Foster5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKimberly Shipley vs Lakitha Smith6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-11vs Seidel/NerellSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDenise Lopatka vs Corinne Monahan7-6
L#2 SinglesCaroline Blanton vs Madison Seidel4-6, 2-6
2026-01-21vs Dameron 18+Split 11
W#2 SinglesKelly Capobianco vs Evelyn Foster6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesHayden Kirby vs Kris Foster3-6, 4-6
2026-01-17vs GainerSplit 11
L#2 SinglesKelly Capobianco vs Paola Marie Colon Barbosa4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesStephanie Gould vs Helen Gainer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-12vs Seidel/NerellLost 03
L#1 SinglesDenise Lopatka vs Corinne Monahan7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCaroline Blanton vs Abigail Hoh4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesHayden Kirby vs Hannah Flynt2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 Women 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Seidel/Nerell7119513155
2Capobianco CFCC44101432243
3Hanly3491226203
4Dameron 18+1771736253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Denise Lopatka
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Kelly Capobianco
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.29
Sarah Beth Deans
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.25
Caroline Blanton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Sarah McLamb
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Stephanie Gould
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
2.88
Hayden Kirby
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Kimberly Shipley
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Lopatka + Hayden Kirby5256% games+4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Lopatka
26W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Kelly Capobianco
24W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Sarah Beth Deans
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Caroline Blanton
23W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Sarah McLamb
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Stephanie Gould
24W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Hayden Kirby
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Kimberly Shipley
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.